Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-218 (2025)

Negligent homicide

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 14-218 is repealed.

(1949 Rev., S. 2415; 1949, S. 1316d; 1971, P.A. 30.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1962–2011 · leading case: State v. Kluttz, 521 A.2d 178 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987).
State v. Kluttz, 521 A.2d 178 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987). · cites it 11× “” In 1971, however, the legislature repealed General Statutes § 14-218, negligent homicide with a motor vehicle.”
McCoy v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 12 A.3d 948 (Conn. 2011). · cites it 4× “Then, in 1971, after the adoption of the Penal Code, the legislature repealed General Statutes § 14-218, the prior negligent homicide with a motor vehicle statute, and reenacted it a few years later in the Penal Code.”
State v. Pope, 313 A.2d 84 (Conn. App. Ct. 1972). · cites it 5× “The defendant was convicted of the crime of negligent homicide in violation of § 14-218 1 of the General Statutes and has appealed.”
United States v. Black, 490 F. Supp. 2d 630 (E.D.N.C. 2007). “C.G.S. § 14-218 and against the peace and dignity of the State.”
State v. Hair, 442 S.E.2d 163 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). “The issues presented are whether (I) the offer of money to an ABC enforcement officer with the request that the officer arrest or stop a person for driving while impaired is a bribe within the meaning of N.”
State v. Benson, 251 A.2d 185 (Conn. App. Ct. 1968). · cites it 2× “The defendant was convicted of the crimes of negligent homicide; Gfeneral Statutes § 14-218; and evading responsibility; § 14-224; and has appealed, assigning error in the denial of his motion to add an additional conclusion and, further, in the conclusion reached by the trial…”
State v. Berkowitz, 1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 439 (Conn. App. Ct. 1962). · cites it 3× “General Statutes § 14-218. He was charged with having caused the death of Lucille M.”
State v. Waterhouse, 394 A.2d 205 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1977). · cites it 3× “The defendant contends that because of the adoption of the Penal Code, title 53a of the General Statutes, which became effective on October 1, 1971, and the repeal of § 14-218 of the General Statutes (negligent homicide), the state has the burden of proving that the defendant…”
State v. Smith, 220 A.2d 44 (Conn. App. Ct. 1965). · cites it 2× “On his appeal from his conviction after a trial to the court for the crimes of reckless driving (General Statutes § 14-222) and negligent homicide (General Statutes §14-218), the defendant has assigned as error the refusal of the court to correct the finding as requested by him,…”
State v. Anonymous (1971-3), 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 393 (Conn. App. Ct. 1970). “In our treatment of the assignment of errors, it is unnecessary to consider other material evidence, both circumstantial and direct, including reasonable inferences which might be drawn by the jury.”
State v. Colombo, 238 A.2d 806 (Conn. App. Ct. 1967). “The defendant, after a trial to the jury, was found not guilty of passing through a *672 red light but was found guilty of the crime of negligent homicide in violation of § 14-218 of the General Statutes. In his appeal, he has assigned error in (1) the denial of his motion to…”
State v. Crispino, 227 A.2d 439 (Conn. App. Ct. 1967). “In a trial to the court, the defendant was found guilty of negligent operation of a motor vehicle upon a public highway, causing the loss of human life, in violation of § 14-218 of the General Statutes. He has appealed, assigning only one error, that on all the evidence the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.