Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-50x (2026)

Exclusive jurisdiction of council; exception. Eminent domain after certification. Municipal regulation of proposed location

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the general statutes, except as provided in section 16-243, the council shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the location and type of facilities and over the location and type of modifications of facilities subject to the provisions of subsection (d) of this section. When evaluating an application for a telecommunication tower within a particular municipality, the council shall consider any location preferences or criteria (1) provided to the council pursuant to section 16-50gg, or (2) that may exist in the zoning regulations of said municipality as of the submission date of the application to the council. In ruling on applications for certificates or petitions for a declaratory ruling for facilities and on requests for shared use of facilities, the council shall give such consideration to other state laws and municipal regulations as it shall deem appropriate. Whenever the council certifies a facility pursuant to this chapter, such certification shall satisfy and be in lieu of all certifications, approvals and other requirements of state and municipal agencies in regard to any questions of public need, convenience and necessity for such facility.

(b) Whenever the council has certified a facility pursuant to this chapter, any person joining in the application for such certification shall be empowered to exercise its powers of eminent domain, granted by the general statutes or any special act, to acquire property for such facility for the benefit of all persons receiving such certificates.

(c) Whenever the council has certified a facility pursuant to this chapter and the applicant for such certificate thereafter initiates condemnation proceedings to acquire property for such facility, and it shall appear to the court or judge before whom such proceedings are pending that the public interest will be prejudiced by delay, said court or judge may direct that said applicant be permitted to enter immediately upon the property to be taken and devote it temporarily to the public use specified in the application instituting such proceeding upon the deposit with said court of a sum to be fixed by said court or judge, upon notice to the parties of not less than ten days, and such sum when fixed and paid shall be applied to the payment of any assessment of damages which may be made, with interest thereon from the date of such entry upon said property, and the remainder, if any, returned to said applicant. If such application is dismissed, no assessment of damages is made, or the proceedings are abandoned by said applicant, said court or judge shall direct that the money so deposited, so far as it may be necessary, shall be applied to the payment of any damages that the owner of said property or other parties in interest may have sustained by such entry upon and use of such property, including reasonable attorneys', engineers' and appraisers' fees and other reasonable expenses incurred by such owner or other parties in interest in connection with such proceedings, and the costs and expenses of such proceedings. Such damages shall be ascertained by said court or judge or a committee to be appointed for that purpose, and if the sum so deposited shall be insufficient to pay such damages and all costs and expenses so assessed, judgment shall be entered against said applicant for the deficiency to be enforced and collected in the same manner as a judgment in the Superior Court, and the possession of such property shall be restored to the owner or owners thereof.

(d) Any town, city or borough zoning commission and inland wetland agency may regulate and restrict the proposed location of a facility, as defined in subdivisions (3) and (4) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i. Such local bodies may make all orders necessary to the exercise of such power to regulate and restrict, which orders shall be in writing and recorded in the records of their respective communities, and written notice of any order shall be given to each party affected thereby. Such a local body shall make any such order (1) not more than sixty-five days after an application has been filed with the council for the siting of a facility described in subdivision (3) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i, or (2) not more than thirty days after an application has been filed with the council for the siting of a facility described in subdivision (4) of subsection (a) of section 16-50i. Each such order shall be subject to the right of appeal within thirty days after the giving of such notice by any municipality required to be served with a copy of the application under subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of section 16-50l or by any party aggrieved to the council, which shall have jurisdiction, in the course of any proceeding on an application for a certificate or otherwise, to affirm, modify or revoke such order or make any order in substitution thereof by a vote of six members of the council.

(P.A. 73-458, S. 4; P.A. 75-375, S. 9, 11, 12; P.A. 94-242, S. 7, 9; P.A. 99-141, S. 1, 3, 4; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 05-1, S. 23; P.A. 07-222, S. 3.)

History: P.A. 75-375 clarified extent of council's jurisdiction in Subsec. (a) and clarified agencies included under applicability provision in Subsec. (d); P.A. 94-242 added reference to rulings on requests for shared use of facilities, effective July 1, 1994; P.A. 99-141 amended Subsec. (d) by adding reference to any municipality required to be served under Sec. 16-50l (b)(1), effective June 8, 1999, and applicable to applications pending before the Connecticut Siting Council on or after that date, and amended Subsec. (d) by deleting provision requiring orders to be made within 30 days of any application and by adding Subdivs. (1) and (2) re time periods in which a local body shall make an order, effective October 1, 1999; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 05-1 amended Subsec. (a) to add “or petitions for a declaratory ruling”, effective July 1, 2005; P.A. 07-222 amended Subsec. (a) to require council to consider municipal location preferences or criteria and make a technical change, effective July 6, 2007.

Cited. 212 C. 157.

Cited. 20 CA 474.

Subsec. (a):

Council had jurisdiction to consider state noise law when ruling on petition for declaratory rulings, however council not required to give any consideration to state noise law when ruling on a petition and had authority to approve project even when project did not comply with state laws outside the Public Utility Environmental Standards Act. 313 C. 669.

Council found to have exclusive jurisdiction in case involving proposed facility that would have both cellular and noncellular attachments. 47 CS 382.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases, 1989–2017 · leading case: Town of Preston v. Connecticut Siting Council, 568 A.2d 799 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Town of Preston v. Connecticut Siting Council, 568 A.2d 799 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990). · cites it 20× “The plaintiffs contend, therefore, that the council exceeded its jursidiction by rendering its decision on the refiled application, council docket number seventy-four, because, under the provisions of General Statutes § 16-50x (d), 6 it had no authority to review the refiled…”

Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 4× “have exclusive jurisdiction of all waters of the state"); General Statutes § 16-50x (a) ("the [Connecticut siting] council shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the location and type of facilities"); General Statutes § 16-243 ("[t]he Department of Public Utility Control shall…”

Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Council, 942 A.2d 345 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 2× “The Public Utility Environmental Standards Act also establishes the siting council; General Statutes § 16-50j; and vests the council with near exclusive jurisdiction, amongst state agencies, over the “location and type of modifications” to existing electricity generating…”

Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting Council, 561 A.2d 931 (Conn. 1989). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes §§ 16-50x and 16-BOi (a).”

Town of Middlebury v. Conn. Siting Council, 161 A.3d 537 (Conn. 2017). · cites it 2× “2d 870 (2006) (under General Statutes § 16-50x [a], providing in relevant part that council " 'shall give such consideration to other state laws and municipal regulations as it shall deem appropriate,' " court concluded that council "did consider the town zoning regulations…”

Town of Westport v. Connecticut Siting Council, 796 A.2d 510 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 5× “4 The council’s decision approving the application was predicated on its determination that it had jurisdiction over the proposed facility because the facility would be “used in a cellular system” within the meaning of General Statutes § 16-50i (a) (6). 5 Indeed, the council…”

SBA Commc'ns, Inc. v. Zoning Comm'n of Franklin, 164 F. Supp. 2d 280 (D. Conn. 2001). · cites it 4× “See Conn. Gen.Stat. § 16-50x. In particular and relevant to this case, the Siting Council has exclusive jurisdiction over “such telecommunications towers, including associated telecommunications equipment .”

Town, Westport v. Connecticut Siting C., No. Cv 00 0501129s (Jun. 27, 2001), 797 A.2d 655 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2001). · cites it 5× “Here, the town’s three witnesses demonstrated that town officers had environmental, planning and zoning interests in the siting of the tower and that the town was obliged to ensure that these interests were pursued.”

Corcoran v. Connecticut Siting Council, 934 A.2d 870 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2006). · cites it 3× “However, General Statutes § 16-50x (a) provides in relevant part: “Notwithstanding any other provision of the general statutes to the contrary, except as provided in section 16-243, the council shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the location and type of facilities and over…”

Brouillard v. Connecticut Siting Council, 39 A.3d 1241 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “It is clear that this tower is not on his property and does not affect any of his specific personal and legal interests as distinguished from a general interest, such as the concern of all members of the community as a whole.”

FairwindCT, Inc. v. Connecticut Siting Council (Conn. 2014). · cites it 14× “The trial court con- cluded that, although § 16-50k (a) required the council to consider only air and water quality standards when determining whether BNE’s petitions should be approved, because the plaintiffs had intervened in the proceedings pursuant to § 22a-19, and because…”

Sprint Spectrum LP v. Connecticut Siting Council, 274 F.3d 674 (2d Cir. 2001). “Conn. Gen.Stat. § 16-50x. On October 29, 1997, Sprint Spectrum petitioned the Siting Council for a declaratory ruling on the scope of its jurisdiction, and posed three questions, only one of which is at issue in this appeal: whether Sprint Spectrum’s towers, which it uses for…”

— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-50x(a) — 1 case

Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004). “have exclusive jurisdiction of all waters of the state"); General Statutes § 16-50x (a) ("the [Connecticut siting] council shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the location and type of facilities"); General Statutes § 16-243 ("[t]he Department of Public Utility Control shall…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.