Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 23 — PARKS, FORESTS AND PUBLIC SHADE TREES · Chapter 449 — Fire Wardens
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 23-34 (2025)

Prosecutorial powers of State Forest Fire Warden

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 23-34 is repealed, effective October 1, 2001.

(1949 Rev., S. 3474; 1961, P.A. 517, S. 104; P.A. 74-183, S. 250, 291; P.A. 76-436, S. 214, 681; P.A. 01-150, S. 20.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2023 · leading case: Brown v. Comm'r of Corr., 282 A.3d 959 (Conn. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brown v. Comm'r of Corr., 282 A.3d 959 (Conn. 2022). · cites it 2× “’’ We also disagree that Practice Book § 23-34 is mirrored by Practice Book § 23-14, as the latter specifically limits complex litigation judges to orders facilitating ‘‘the management of . . . complex litigation cases.’’ (Emphasis added.”
Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr., 189 A.3d 578 (Conn. 2018). “See Practice Book § 23-34 ("[t]he judicial authority may establish such additional procedures as it determines will aid in the fair and summary disposition of habeas corpus **726 petitions, including, but not limited to, scheduling orders").”
Fuller v. Comm'r of Corr., 71 A.3d 689 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). “Practice Book § 23-34 (a) provides in relevant part: “The judicial authority shall promptly review any petition for a writ of habeas corpus to determine whether the writ should issue.”
State v. Douglas C., No. SC20456 (Conn. Jan. 10, 2023). · cites it 11× “Rather than analyze the controlling Practice Book sections in chapter 11, the majority opinion relies on perceived textual differences between Practice Book §§ 23-24 and 23-29, a sweeping citation to § 23-34, and certain extratextual sources in an effort to support its…”
Kendall v. Comm'r of Corr., 162 Conn. App. 23 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015). “2d 315 (1997); see also Practice Book § 23-34 (‘‘[t]he judicial authority may establish such additional procedures as it determines will aid in the fair and summary disposition of habeas corpus petitions, includ- ing, but not limited to, scheduling orders’’). A habeas proceeding…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.