Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-81r (2026)

Sexual orientation discrimination: Construction of statutes

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 46a-81r is repealed, effective April 23, 2009.

(P.A. 91-58, S. 36; P.A. 07-142, S. 4; P.A. 09-13, S. 20.)

Secs. 46a-81s to 46a-81z. Reserved for future use.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1996–2015 · leading case: Kerrigan v. Comm'r of Pub. Health, 957 A.2d 407 (Conn. 2008).
Kerrigan v. Comm'r of Pub. Health, 957 A.2d 407 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 24× “" [44] General Statutes § 46a-81r. By singling out same sex relationships in this manner—there is, of course, no such statutory disclaimer for opposite sex relationships—the legislature effectively has proclaimed, as a matter of state policy, that same sex *449 relationships are…”
Rosengarten v. Downes, 802 A.2d 170 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 3× “General Statutes § 46a-81r, one of the sections of title 46a on which the plaintiff relies, provides in relevant part: “Nothing in sections .”
Patino v. Birken Mfg. Co., 41 A.3d 1013 (Conn. 2012). · cites it 2× “to 2009) § 46a-81r (law shall not be construed "to mean that the state of Connecticut condones homosexuality"); [17] General Statutes § 46a-81p (exception for religious institutions); General Statutes § 46a-81q *1025 (exception for ROTC programs); § 46a-81c, the employment…”
Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Bd. of Trs., 673 A.2d 484 (Conn. 1996). · cites it 2× “” General Statutes § 46a-81r provides: “Sexual orientation discrimination: Construction of statutes.”
Cote-Whitacre v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 446 Mass. 350 (Mass. 2006). “See Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 46a-81r (West 2004) (listing Connecticut laws that shall not be “deemed or construed” to authorize the recognition or right of marriage between persons of the same sex); Me.”
Boy Scouts of Am. v. Wyman, 335 F.3d 80 (2d Cir. 2003). · cites it 3× “§ 1988 , for infringements of its First Amendment rights; (2) the state regulations governing participation in the Campaign, Conn.”
Boy Scouts of Am. v. Wyman, 213 F. Supp. 2d 159 (D. Conn. 2002). · cites it 11× “§ 1983 (Count 1); violated its rights under § 5-262-3(k) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies by disallowing the BSA to participate in the Campaign without a decision by the CHRO on whether the Boy Scout membership policies violate a Connecticut anti-discrimination…”
State v. Santiago (Conn. 2015). “45 (concluding ‘‘that the disclaimer set forth in [General Statutes] § 46a-81r [1] was a political compromise designed to assure persons opposed to homosexual conduct of this state’s unwillingness to approve or condone such conduct’’); see also Griswold Inn, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.