Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-16 (2026)

Lost deed of land in two or more towns, copy recorded

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
When any conveyance of land, situated in two or more towns, has been lost after being recorded in one or more of such towns, a certified copy of the record thereof may be recorded in the other towns; and, when so recorded, shall have the same effect as a record of the original instrument.

(1949 Rev., S. 7099.)

Cited. 228 C. 795; 237 C. 613.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1987–1998 · leading case: State v. Indrisano, 640 A.2d 986 (Conn. 1994).
State v. Indrisano, 640 A.2d 986 (Conn. 1994). · cites it 2× “If two or more words are grouped together, it is possible to ascertain the meaning of a particular word by reference to its relationship with other associated words and phrases under the doctrine of noscitur a sociis.”
State v. Szymkiewicz, 678 A.2d 473 (Conn. 1996). “If two or more words are grouped together, it is possible to ascertain the meaning of a particular word by reference to its relationship with other associated words and phrases under the doctrine ofnoscitur asociis.”
State v. Lo Sacco, 531 A.2d 184 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987). “When two or more words are grouped together, it is possible to ascertain the meaning of a particular word by reference to its relationship with other associated words and phrases under the doctrine of noscitur a sociis.”
State v. Ryan, 709 A.2d 21 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998). “See 1971 Public Ads, No. 871, § 52. Our Supreme Court has stated that “[i]f two or more words are grouped together, it is possible to ascertain the meaning of a particular word by reference to its relationship with other associated words and phrases under the doctrine of…”
State v. Szymkiewicz, 652 A.2d 523 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). “If two or more words are grouped together, it is possible to ascertain the meaning of a particular word by reference to its relationship with other associated words and phrases under the doctrine of noscitur a sociis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.