Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-175 (2026)
Riot in the first degree: Class A misdemeanor
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) A person is guilty of riot in the first degree when simultaneously with six or more other persons he engages in tumultuous and violent conduct and thereby intentionally or recklessly causes or creates a grave risk of causing public alarm, and in the course of and as a result of such conduct, a person other than one of the participants suffers physical injury or substantial property damage occurs.
(b) Riot in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor.
(1969, P.A. 828, S. 177.)
Cited. 32 CA 224.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1988–2011 · leading case: State v. McCahill, 811 A.2d 667 (Conn. 2002).
State v. McCahill, 811 A.2d 667 (Conn. 2002). “…Statutes § 53a-63); reckless endangerment in the second degree (General Statutes § 53a-64); riot in the first degree (General Statutes § 53a-175); breach of the peace (General Statutes § 53a-181); creating apublic disturbance (General Statutes § 53a-181a); stalking in the…”
Kuck v. Danaher, 822 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D. Conn. 2011). “§ 53a-96, first degree riot in violation of Conn. Gen.Stat. § 53a-175, second degree riot in violation of Conn.”
United States v. Johnson, 616 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2010). “" See Conn. Gen.Stat. § 53a-175; Conn. Gen.Stat.”
State v. Nixon, 630 A.2d 74 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993). “, General Statutes § 53a-175 (first degree riot); General Statutes § 53a-176 (second degree riot); General Statutes § 53a-177 (unlawful assembly).”
Schlamp v. State, 891 A.2d 327 (Md. 2006). “§ 18-9-101; Conn. Gen.Stat Ann § 53a-175; D.C.Code ann § 22-1322; Ga.”
Dorman v. Satti, 678 F. Supp. 375 (D. Conn. 1988). “Section 53a-175, the immediate and virtually identical precursor to Section 53a-182(a)(2)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.