Florida Statute 7.06 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.06

7.06 Broward County.—The boundary lines of Broward County are as follows: Beginning on the east boundary of the State of Florida at a point where the south boundary of township forty-seven south of range forty-three east, produced easterly, would intersect the same; thence westerly on said township boundary to its intersection with the axis or center line of Hillsborough State Drainage Canal, as at present located and constructed; thence westerly along the center line of said canal to its intersection with the range line dividing ranges forty and forty-one east; thence south on the range line dividing ranges forty and forty-one east, of township forty-seven south, to the northeast corner of section twenty-five of township forty-seven, south, of range forty east; thence due west on the north boundaries of the sections numbered from twenty-five to thirty, inclusive, of townships forty-seven south, of ranges thirty-seven to forty east, inclusive, as the same have been surveyed, or may hereafter be surveyed, by the authority of the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, to the northwest corner of section thirty of township forty-seven south, of range thirty-seven east; thence continuing due west to the range line between ranges thirty-four and thirty-five east; thence southerly on the range line dividing ranges thirty-four and thirty-five east, to the southwest corner of township fifty-one south, of range thirty-five east; thence east following the south line of township fifty-one south, across ranges thirty-five, thirty-six, thirty-seven, thirty-eight, thirty-nine and forty, to the southwest corner of township fifty-one south of range forty-one east; thence north on the range line dividing ranges forty and forty-one to the northwest corner of section thirty-one of township fifty-one south, of range forty-one east; thence east on the north boundary of section thirty-one and other sections to the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; thence easterly to the eastern boundary of the State of Florida; thence northerly along said eastern boundary to the point of beginning. In addition, the boundary lines of Broward County include the following: Begin at the northwest corner of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, Miami-Dade County, Florida; thence, southerly following the west line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the intersection with a line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, easterly following the line which is two hundred and thirty feet south of and parallel to the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east, to the intersection with the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach; thence, northerly following the west boundary line of the Town of Golden Beach to the intersection with the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east; thence, westerly following the north line of section thirty-five, township fifty-one south, range forty-two east to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, ch. 6934, 1915; RGS 60; CGL 66; ss. 27, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 78-119; s. 1, ch. 2007-222; s. 1, ch. 2010-5.

F.S. 7.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.06 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.06

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.06

Total Results: 35

Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach

760 So. 2d 126, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 390, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 911, 2000 WL 633052

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2000 | Docket: 1695356

Cited 591 times | Published

§ 3.6; see also Primary Declaration art. VII, § 7.6. Aberdeen's construction is reasonable and it would

Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc.

162 F.3d 1290, 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 244, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31647, 1998 WL 886794

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 18, 1998 | Docket: 333717

Cited 255 times | Published

one another. Williston on Contracts § 7:6, at 77-79, 87 (footnotes omitted). If, however

Jane Doe v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.

394 F.3d 891, 2005 A.M.C. 214, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26743, 2004 WL 2955003

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 22, 2004 | Docket: 76384

Cited 111 times | Published

” Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.06 (Tentative Draft No. 5, 2004). The relevant comment

Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Cross-Appellants, State of Florida, Intervenor-Appellant v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees

711 F.2d 1455, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28911

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 12, 1983 | Docket: 446391

Cited 90 times | Published

history offers little guidance. See Davis § 7.6, p. 32. The Supreme Court has yet to offer a definitive

Charles R. Hall Motors, Inc. v. Lewis

137 F.3d 1280, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 740, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5823, 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 488, 1998 WL 132907

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 25, 1998 | Docket: 74546

Cited 61 times | Published

attorneys’ fees and legal expenses. Ala.Code § 7-6-506 (1993).

Gilchrist Timber v. ITT Rayonier, Inc.

696 So. 2d 334, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 365, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 944, 1997 WL 348100

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1997 | Docket: 1325698

Cited 59 times | Published

also Fowler V. Harper, et al., The Law of Torts § 7.6 (2d ed.1986). As noted in the above-cited annotation

1ST AMERICAN TITLE INS. v. 1st Title Serv. Co.

457 So. 2d 467, 50 A.L.R. 4th 301

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1984 | Docket: 1522435

Cited 54 times | Published

context. See 1 Harper & James, The Law of Torts, § 7.6; 17 C.J.S., Contracts, § 154(c). It should be noted

City of Boca Raton v. Gidman

440 So. 2d 1277, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2904

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1983 | Docket: 1430093

Cited 54 times | Published

such contribution was expressly prohibited by section 7.06, Boca Raton City Charter which provides: Expenditure

Charles R. Hall Motors v. Lewis

137 F.3d 1280

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 25, 1998 | Docket: 422488

Cited 33 times | Published

fees and legal expenses. Ala. Code § 7-6-506 (1993).

Alexander A. Simon, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Michael W. Swofford, Cross-Appellants

895 F.2d 1304, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2346, 1990 WL 14485

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 20, 1990 | Docket: 677188

Cited 28 times | Published

fact. R. Smolla, The Law of Defamation, § 7.06[3] (1986). Although some jurisdictions have blurred

David E. Moore, an Individual v. Sun Bank of North Florida, N.A. A Florida Corporation

923 F.2d 1423, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1736, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1690, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,534, 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1598, 1991 WL 10143

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 25, 1991 | Docket: 512706

Cited 15 times | Published

individual in the United States, as defined in section 7(6), shall, solely by reason of his handicap, be

Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,098 Pete J. Buffo v. Charles A. Graddick, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Respondent

742 F.2d 592, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18433

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 20, 1984 | Docket: 253501

Cited 14 times | Published

Securities Fraud & Commodities Fraud § 7.6(1) (1983). In one of the more detailed discussions

Suntrust Bank v. Riverside Nat. Bank

792 So. 2d 1222, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144, 2001 WL 980818

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2001 | Docket: 1735374

Cited 12 times | Published

the Restatement (Third) of Property: Mortgages section 7.6 cmt.e (1996), a refinancing lender is equitably

Bush v. Holmes

886 So. 2d 340, 2004 WL 2566078

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2004 | Docket: 1379958

Cited 9 times | Published

to the instant case. Gidman addressed whether section 7.06 of the city's charter, which prohibited the

White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

633 F. Supp. 2d 1302, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2009 | Docket: 1266875

Cited 8 times | Published

their fair market value. (Doc. 44-11, p. 20). Section 7.6 provides that the term of the MSA shall continue

Banco Latino International v. Gomez-Lopez (In Re Banco Latino International)

310 B.R. 780, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11240, 2004 WL 1374436

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 19, 2004 | Docket: 2450851

Cited 6 times | Published

Order at 5; Debt. Br. at 5; Cr. Br. at 7-8. Section 7.6 of the Debtor's pre-petition corporate by-laws

Blumstein v. Sports Immortals, Inc.

67 So. 3d 437, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13357, 2011 WL 3687423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2011 | Docket: 2363182

Cited 4 times | Published

information. 1 F. Harper & F. James, The Law of Torts § 7.6 (1956). As pleaded, the complaint satisfies the

Picker Financial Group L.L.C. v. Horizon Bank

293 B.R. 253, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8716, 2003 WL 21205285

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 12, 2003 | Docket: 1860281

Cited 4 times | Published

the Restatement (Third) of Property: Mortgages § 7.6 cmt. e (1996), a refinancing lender is equitably

Evans v. Evans

595 So. 2d 988, 1992 WL 38470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1992 | Docket: 1299266

Cited 4 times | Published

Law of Domestic Relations in the United States § 7.6, at 277 (2d ed. 1987). In so concluding, I recognize

Nikooie v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

183 So. 3d 424, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20020, 2014 WL 6911148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2014 | Docket: 2613274

Cited 2 times | Published

the Restatement (Third) of Property: Mortgages section 7.6. In this case, Washington Mutual paid off Washington

Ancrum v. State

146 So. 3d 1217, 2014 WL 4336984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2014 | Docket: 1149570

Cited 1 times | Published

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual, § 7.6 (2008 ed.)).

Heron at Destin West Beach & Bay Resort Condominium Ass'n v. Osprey at Destin West Beach

94 So. 3d 623, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10604, 2012 WL 2546063

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2012 | Docket: 60310919

Cited 1 times | Published

Association.” (Emphasis added). Appellees argue that section 7.6 of the Articles of Incorporation conflicts.with

Hale v. Department of Revenue

973 So. 2d 518, 2007 WL 4438876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2007 | Docket: 1293400

Cited 1 times | Published

generally, Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 7.6 (2007 ed.). The Hales' complaint contains neither

MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.

508 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 2341633

Cited 1 times | Published

Administrator[10] unless exempted by the sign regulations. See § 7.06.01A. Signs exempt by the regulations from the permit

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

858 So. 2d 1013, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2003 | Docket: 64826361

Cited 1 times | Published

stipulated to by the parties in accordance with section 7-6§.57(4)-766.106(4), Florida Statutes. Committee

MARK KOYFMAN v. 1572 PLEDGER LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2020 | Docket: 18747976

Published

assumed the debt). Restatement (Third) of Property § 7.6 cmt. c (1997).

Randall Blake, James Bradford v. St. Johns River Power Park System Employees' etc.

275 So. 3d 804

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2019 | Docket: 15891696

Published

subject to five (5%) interest. 3. Plan section 7.06(2) requires all actions of the Committee

Towbin v. Antonacci

885 F. Supp. 2d 1274, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187259, 2012 WL 3541703

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2012 | Docket: 65984241

Published

Stat. Ann. § 16-905(Z)(3) (2006); AricCode Ann. § 7-6-205(d) (West 2004) Cal. Gov.Code § 85308(b) (West

Graham v. Haridopolos

75 So. 3d 315, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16060, 2011 WL 4818046

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2011 | Docket: 439106

Published

constitutional provisions and the language of article IX, section 7.[6] Finally, Appellants argue that this court's

Patricia W. Buce v. National Service Industries

247 F.3d 1133, 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2441, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050, 2001 WL 357091

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 10, 2001 | Docket: 396631

Published

this distinction. (3 Harnett & Lesnick, supra, § 7.06[1], pp.7-112-7-116).” Weil v. Federal Kemper Life

Patricia W. Buce v. National Service Industries

247 F.3d 1133

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 10, 2001 | Docket: 396646

Published

this distinction. (3 Harnett & Lesnick, supra, § 7.06[1], pp.7-112-7-116 ).” Weil v. Federal Kemper

Johnson v. Telesat Cablevision

162 F.3d 1290

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 18, 1998 | Docket: 767086

Published

to support one another. Williston on Contracts § 7:6, at 77-79, 87 (footnotes omitted). If

Gus Machado Buick, Inc. v. Westland Skating Center, Inc.

523 So. 2d 596, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1289, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8331, 1987 WL 381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1987 | Docket: 64634165

Published

Cunningham, W. Stoebuck, D. Whitman, The Law of Property § 7.6 (1984). JURY INSTRUCTION Consistent with tort concepts

Gidman v. Bureau

416 So. 2d 1168, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1982 | Docket: 64591256

Published

of a charitable organization in violation of Section 7.06 of the City Charter. Appellees answered, contending

Board of Trustees of the Miami Beach Employees Retirement System v. Bornstein

307 So. 2d 237, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14602

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1975 | Docket: 64544069

Published

pursuant to Ordinance No. 1901, Article *238VII, Section 7.06(c), Ordinances of the City of Miami Beach.”