CopyCited 591 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 390, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 911, 2000 WL 633052
§ 3.6; see also Primary Declaration art. VII, § 7.6. Aberdeen's construction is reasonable and it would
0 red0 yellow444 green0 procedural
CopyCited 255 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 244, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31647, 1998 WL 886794
one another. Williston on Contracts § 7:6, at 77-79, 87 (footnotes omitted). If, however
0 red0 yellow147 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGoulding (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 111 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2005 A.M.C. 214, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26743, 2004 WL 2955003
...Likewise, the tentative
draft of the Restatement (Third) of Agency, in the corresponding section states: “A principal
required by law to protect another cannot avoid liability by delegating performance of the duty to
another, whether or not the delegate is an agent.” Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.06
(Tentative Draft No....
...The relevant comment notes that the section “states the basic
tort-law principle that a principal may be subject to liability to a third person when the principal
is under a duty to protect that person. The principle is often termed one of "nondelegable" duty .
. .” Id. § 7.06, cmt....
0 red1 yellow67 green3 procedural
Cited as authorityWard (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 59 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 365, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 944, 1997 WL 348100
also Fowler V. Harper, et al., The Law of Torts § 7.6 (2d ed.1986). As noted in the above-cited annotation
0 red0 yellow56 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityCoombs (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 61 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 740, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5823, 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 488, 1998 WL 132907
attorneys’ fees and legal expenses. Ala.Code § 7-6-506 (1993).
0 red0 yellow47 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDaly (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 54 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 50 A.L.R. 4th 301
context. See 1 Harper & James, The Law of Torts, § 7.6; 17 C.J.S., Contracts, § 154(c). It should be noted
0 red2 yellow34 green0 procedural
LimitedPate (1995)phrase: "limited in"
CopyCited 54 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2904
...and summer programs for disadvantaged children. The respondents, taxpayers and citizens of the city, sued the petitioners, the city of Boca Raton, et al., to enjoin the contribution. They contended that such contribution was expressly prohibited by section 7.06, Boca Raton City Charter which provides: Expenditure of Funds Limited No city funds shall be expended in any manner whatsoever to accrue either directly or indirectly to the benefit of any religious, charitable, benevolent, civic or service organization....
...The court held that the charter provision is such an express limitation and a "functional test" cannot be applied. On petition for rehearing, the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance: Does Section 7.06 of the Charter of the City of Boca Raton, which provides that [n]o city funds shall be expended in any manner whatsoever to accrue either directly or indirectly to the benefit of any religious, charitable, benevolent, civic or service or...
... The purpose of this act is to provide standards, direction, and procedures for the formation of local governmental units in this state and the provision of local governmental services so as to: (1) ... (2) Assure adequate quality and quantity of local public services. A literal interpretation of section 7.06, Boca Raton City Charter would not only lead to an absurd result but would also place it in direct conflict with other laws relating to the same purpose....
0 red1 yellow33 green0 procedural
LimitedJacobs (1991)phrase: "limited by"
CopyCited 28 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2346, 1990 WL 14485
...and that charging a woman with unchastity. In contrast, in the law of libel, “per se ” has taken on a separate meaning and refers to a statement that is understood as defamatory without resort to extrinsic fact. R. Smolla, The Law of Defamation, § 7.06[3] (1986)....
0 red0 yellow29 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityZEDAN (2021)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityFairstein (2020)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 90 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28911
history offers little guidance. See Davis § 7.6, p. 32. The Supreme Court has yet to offer a definitive
6 red3 yellow78 green0 procedural
CopyCited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
fees and legal expenses. Ala. Code § 7-6-506 (1993).
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CopyCited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18433
Securities Fraud & Commodities Fraud § 7.6(1) (1983). In one of the more detailed discussions
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityTucker (2003)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityNagle (1999)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1736, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1690, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40, 534, 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1598, 1991 WL 10143
individual in the United States, as defined in section 7(6), shall, solely by reason of his handicap, be
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySims (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authoritySandoval (1998)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12144, 2001 WL 980818
the Restatement (Third) of Property: Mortgages section 7.6 cmt.e (1996), a refinancing lender is equitably
0 red0 yellow10 green2 procedural
Cited as authorityNikooie (2014)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2566078
...at 1422-3 (Brennan, J., concurring) (footnotes, quotation marks, and citations omitted). [11] The dissent asserts that City of Boca Raton v. Gidman,
440 So.2d 1277 (Fla.1983), supports reversal here. Gidman is inapposite to the instant case. Gidman addressed whether section
7.06 of the city's charter, which prohibited the expenditure of city funds "whatsoever to accrue either directly or indirectly to the benefit of any religious, charitable, benevolent, civic or service organization," prevented the city from contracting with a non-profit organization to provide a child daycare center. Id. at 1278. The city possessed broad home rule powers under Article VIII, section 2(b) of the Florida Constitution, and section
166.021(4), Florida Statutes (1979), to act for a "municipal purpose." Id. at 1280. The Supreme Court interpreted section
7.06 of the charter to allow the expenditure of city funds to a non-profit organization for childcare services consistent with the City's home rule powers....
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliamson (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 8 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135
their fair market value. (Doc. 44-11, p. 20). Section 7.6 provides that the term of the MSA shall continue
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJuravin (2025)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11240, 2004 WL 1374436
Order at 5; Debt. Br. at 5; Cr. Br. at 7-8. Section 7.6 of the Debtor's pre-petition corporate by-laws
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGreene (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13357, 2011 WL 3687423
information. 1 F. Harper & F. James, The Law of Torts § 7.6 (1956). As pleaded, the complaint satisfies the
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityColeman (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8716, 2003 WL 21205285
the Restatement (Third) of Property: Mortgages § 7.6 cmt. e (1996), a refinancing lender is equitably
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 38470
Law of Domestic Relations in the United States § 7.6, at 277 (2d ed. 1987). In so concluding, I recognize
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMorris (1996)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMcAlister (1994)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20020, 2014 WL 6911148
the Restatement (Third) of Property: Mortgages section 7.6. In this case, Washington Mutual paid off Washington
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDelgado (2023)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375
stipulated to by the parties in accordance with section 7-6§.57(4)-766.106(4), Florida Statutes. Committee
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityVarnedore (2017)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 4438876
generally, Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 7.6 (2007 ed.). The Hales' complaint contains neither
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDetzner (2016)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityN.S. (2013)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10604, 2012 WL 2546063
Association.” (Emphasis added). Appellees argue that section 7.6 of the Articles of Incorporation conflicts.with
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHall (2016)phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityStraub (2013)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 4336984
The Law Officer's Pocket Manual, § 7.6 (2008 ed.)).
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRivera (2024)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35731, 2007 WL 1455963
...County Sign Regulations in effect prior to the adoption." See (Doc. 92, Ex. 4). B. The old sign regulations at issue here were contained within Article VII of the County's Land Development Code (hereinafter "Code") and included parts 7.00.00 through 7.06.02....
...gns expressly prohibited; (3) permitted temporary signs; and (4) permitted permanent signs. See, e.g., §§ 7.01.00, 7.02.00, 7.03.00, 7.04.00. All signs required a permit issued by the Administrator [10] unless exempted by the sign regulations. See § 7.06.01A....
...tination, historic district, public institution, hospital, college, unique geographic area, or non-profit public service institution; and on-site signs. See §§ 7.04.01, 7.04.02, 7.04.03. The procedures for obtaining a sign permit were set forth in § 7.06.00. That section provided that an application for a sign permit must be reviewed pursuant to the Procedure for Issuance of a Development Permit in Part 10.01.00 of the Code and § 4.1.9 of the DRP Manual. See § 7.06.01....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16060, 2011 WL 4818046
constitutional provisions and the language of article IX, section 7.[6] Finally, Appellants argue that this court's
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRomo (2013)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21084
of a charitable organization in violation of Section 7.06 of the City Charter. Appellees answered, contending
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGidman (1983)phrase: "rule_authority"
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1289, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8331, 1987 WL 381
Cunningham, W. Stoebuck, D. Whitman, The Law of Property § 7.6 (1984). JURY INSTRUCTION Consistent with tort concepts
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...a hardship
even if there were such an exception for any of the
Members . . . .
2. Plan section
10.15 provides that any
overpayment due to the Plan’s trust fund shall be
subject to five (5%) interest.
3. Plan section
7.06(2) requires all actions of the
Committee to be uniform and nondiscriminatory, and
3
other Plan participants have been assessed the interest
charge.
4....
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14602
pursuant to Ordinance No. 1901, Article *238VII, Section 7.06(c), Ordinances of the City of Miami Beach.”
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
to support one another. Williston on Contracts § 7:6, at 77-79, 87 (footnotes omitted). If
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
assumed the debt). Restatement (Third) of Property § 7.6 cmt. c (1997).
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2441, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050, 2001 WL 357091
...ntal death’ (3 Harnett & Lesnick, [The Law of Life and Health Insurance], § 7.03[1], pp. 7-24 — 7-29; id., (1992 supp.) p. 5), whereas 25 jurisdictions expressly have rejected or repudiated this distinction. (3 Harnett & Lesnick, supra, § 7.06[1], pp.7-112-7-116).” Weil v....
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
...�accidental death’ (3 Harnett &
Lesnick, [The Law of Life and Health Insurance], § 7.03[1], pp. 7-24–7-29; id.,
(1992 supp.) p. 5), whereas 25 jurisdictions expressly have rejected or repudiated
this distinction. (3 Harnett & Lesnick, supra, § 7.06[1], pp.7-112-7-116 ).” Weil
v....