Florida Statute 43.51 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 43
COURTS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 43.51

43.51 Problem-solving court reports.—

(1) The Office of the State Courts Administrator shall provide an annual report to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives which details the number of participants in each problem-solving court for each fiscal year the court has been operating and the types of services provided, identifies each source of funding for each court during each fiscal year, and provides information on the performance of each court based upon outcome measures established by the courts.

(2) For purposes of this section, the term “problem-solving court” includes, but is not limited to, a drug court pursuant to s. 397.334, s. 948.01, s. 948.06, s. 948.08, s. 948.16, or s. 948.20; a veterans treatment court program pursuant to s. 394.47891, s. 948.08, s. 948.16, or s. 948.21; a mental health court program pursuant to s. 394.47892, s. 948.01, s. 948.06, s. 948.08, or s. 948.16; a community court pursuant to s. 948.081; or a delinquency pretrial intervention court program pursuant to s. 985.345.

History.—s. 3, ch. 2019-167; s. 2, ch. 2021-240.

F.S. 43.51 on Google Scholar

F.S. 43.51 on Casetext

Amendments to 43.51

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 43.51

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 43.51.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 43.51

Total Results: 6

Lowe v. Nissan of Brandon, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-01-05

Citation: 235 So. 3d 1021

Snippet: original); cf. Jenkins v, Eckerd Corp,, 913 So.2d 43, 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“The contract must contain

Mady v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-24

Citation: 59 So. 3d 1129, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 117, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 672, 2011 WL 1045598

Snippet: cited the appendix in Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1, 43-51, 105 S.Ct. 3012, 87 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985) (appendix to

Rath v. Network Marketing, LC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-05-16

Citation: 790 So. 2d 461, 2001 WL 527722

Snippet: process." Teradyne, Inc. v. Mostek Corp., 797 F.2d 43, 51 (1st Cir.1986); accord Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner

Hatcher v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-06-09

Citation: 545 So. 2d 400, 1989 WL 61532

Snippet: (emphasis added); 28 Fla. Jur.2d Guardian and Ward §§ 43, 51 (1981). Although Section 744.441(19), Florida Statutes

Rorick v. Chancey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-12-22

Citation: 178 So. 112, 130 Fla. 442, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 875

Snippet: Ed. 431; Clark v. Wells, 203 U.S. 164, 27 S. Ct. 43,51 L. Ed. 138; Cain v. Commercial Publishing Co., 232

Rader v. Prather

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-08-05

Citation: 130 So. 15, 100 Fla. 591

Snippet: (U.S.) 416, 19 L.Ed. 166; Kann v. King, 204 U.S. 43,51 L.Ed. 360; 27 Sup. Ct. R. 213; Abrams v. Watson