Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 456.018 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 456.018 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 456.018

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 456
HEALTH PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 456.018
456.018 Penalty for theft or reproduction of an examination.In addition to, or in lieu of, any other discipline imposed pursuant to s. 456.072, the theft of an examination in whole or in part or the act of reproducing or copying any examination administered by the department, whether such examination is reproduced or copied in part or in whole and by any means, constitutes a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 55, ch. 97-261; s. 50, ch. 2000-160; s. 27, ch. 2000-318.
Note.Former s. 455.577.

F.S. 456.018 on Google Scholar

F.S. 456.018 on Casetext

Amendments to 456.018


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 456.018
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S456.018 - FORGERY - REPRODUCE DEPT OF HEALTH EXAM - F: T
S456.018 - LARC - THEFT OF EXAM ADMINISTERED BY DEPT OF HEALTH - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 456.018

Total Results: 18

McRae v. JD/MD, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-07-09

Citation: 511 So. 2d 540, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 332, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2051

Snippet: 20 So. 766 (1896); Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 So. 594 (1895). [4] It has been held by other

State Ex Rel. Vining v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-04-04

Citation: 281 So. 2d 487, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5019

Snippet: (1912); State ex rel. Hand v. McDonald, 154 Fla. 456, 18 So.2d 16 (1944); State ex rel. Jordan v. Pattishall

Conners v. Gaskins

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-11-23

Citation: 82 Fla. 389, 90 So. 379

Snippet: should be reversed. See Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Walter v. Florida Savings Bank

Tripp v. Wade

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-10-27

Citation: 82 Fla. 325, 1921 Fla. LEXIS 472, 89 So. 870

Snippet: Rep. 792; Parkhurst v Stone and Gove, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Buesing v. Forbes, 33 Fla. 495

Hanley v. Bullard

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-10-19

Citation: 80 Fla. 578, 86 So. 439

Snippet: 33 South. Rep. 996; Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Russ v. Mitchell, 11 Fla. 80;

County of Santa Rosa v. Trobuck

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-01-23

Citation: 77 Fla. 86

Snippet: 14 South. Rep. 812; Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Chapman v. Reddick, 41 Fla. 120

Berger v. E. Berger & Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1918-12-02

Citation: 76 Fla. 503, 80 So. 296

Snippet: Bank, 20 Fla. 826; Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Williams Co. v. Pensacola, St

Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. McDonald

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1918-06-15

Citation: 76 Fla. 599

Snippet: 48 South. Rep. 630; Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Southern Home Ins. Co. v. Putnal

Williams v. Peninsular Grocery Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-05-03

Citation: 73 Fla. 937, 75 So. 517

Snippet: note was paid. Se.e Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; McConnell v. Sullivan, 37 Fla

J. P. Williams Co. v. Pensacola, St. Andrews & Gulf Steamship Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1909-01-15

Citation: 57 Fla. 237

Snippet: ground for reversal. Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Sammis v. Wightman, 31 Fla. 10

McKinnon v. Johnson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1909-01-15

Citation: 57 Fla. 120

Snippet: Maxwell Land Grant & Ry. Co., 168 U. S. 451, text 456, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 121, “We take judicial notice of

E. O. Painter Fertilizer Co. v. DuPont

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-06-15

Citation: 54 Fla. 288

Snippet: 15 South. Rep. 670; Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Florida Cent. & P. R. Co., v.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Crosby

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 400

Snippet: stricken out. See Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594, and authorities there cited; Camp

Hooker v. Forrester

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1907-01-15

Citation: 53 Fla. 392

Snippet: for demurring. See Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Little v. Bradley, 43 Fla. 402

Muller v. Ocala Foundry & Machine Works

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1905-01-15

Citation: 49 Fla. 189

Snippet: 18 South. Rep. 870; Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594. The transcript does not contain

Craft v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 222

Snippet: this distinction. Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594, and cases there cited. *225The

Little v. Bradley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1901-06-15

Citation: 43 Fla. 402

Snippet: 11 South. Rep. 182; Parkhurst v. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594; Camp v. Hall, 39 Fla. 535, 22

McConnell v. Sullivan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1896-01-15

Citation: 37 Fla. 576

Snippet: error on the record. Parkhurst vs. Stone, 36 Fla. 456, 18 South. Rep. 594. We affirm the judgment on the