Florida Statute 495.181 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 495
REGISTRATION AND PROTECTION OF TRADEMARKS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 495.181

495.181 Construction of chapter.—The intent of this chapter is to provide a system of state trademark registration and protection substantially consistent with the federal system of trademark registration and protection under the Trademark Act of 1946, as amended. To that end, the construction given the federal act should be examined as persuasive authority for interpreting and construing this chapter.

History.—s. 7, ch. 90-222; s. 20, ch. 2006-191.

F.S. 495.181 on Google Scholar

F.S. 495.181 on Casetext

Amendments to 495.181

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 495.181

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 495.181.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 495.181

Total Results: 7

Anderson v. Upper Keys Business Group, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-20

Citation: 61 So. 3d 1162, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5569, 2011 WL 1485989

Snippet: 1382072, at *4 (M.D.Fla. May 18, 2006); see also § 495.181, Fla. Stat. (2008) (“The intent of this chapter

Tortoise Island Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Tortoise Island Realty, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-07-13

Citation: 790 So. 2d 525, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9707, 2001 WL 786746

Snippet: provisions of the Lanham Act,[2] "because section 495.181, directs that the federal cases be given great

Promotora De Servicios, S.A. v. Los Ranchos Restaurant, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-03-22

Citation: 755 So. 2d 173, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3403, 2000 WL 293555

Snippet: instructions to reinstate Promotora’s complaint. See § 495.181, Fla. Stat. (Supp.l998)(“It is the intent of the

Great Southern v. First Southern

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-10-07

Citation: 625 So. 2d 463, 30 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1522, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 525, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1630, 1993 WL 391614

Snippet: Lanham Act[3] [hereinafter Act], because section 495.181, Florida Statutes (1991),[4] directs that these

Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown National Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-08-17

Citation: 419 So. 2d 1107, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20927

Snippet: Bullock Co. v. South Down Development Co., 132 Fla. 495, 181 So. 365 (Fla.1938); Freligh v. Maurer, 111 So

In Interest of JS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-10-21

Citation: 404 So. 2d 1144

Snippet: Bullock Co. v. Southdown Development Co., 132 Fla. 495, 181 So. 365 (1938); Wong v. Wersebe, 365 So.2d 429

Switow v. Sher

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-02-07

Citation: 186 So. 519, 136 Fla. 284, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1552

Snippet: Bullock Co. v. South Down Development Co., 132 Fla. 495, 181 So. 365, we held: *Page 295 "The sole question