Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 499.92 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 499.92 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 499.92

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 499
FLORIDA DRUG AND COSMETIC ACT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 499.92
499.92 Criminal acts.
(1) A person commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if he or she:
(a) Adulterates or misbrands a medical gas with intent to defraud or deceive;
(b) Knowingly purchases or receives a medical gas from a person not legally authorized to distribute or dispense medical gas;
(c) Knowingly engages in the wholesale distribution of, or sells, barters, brokers, or transfers, a medical gas to a person not legally authorized to purchase or receive medical gas in the jurisdiction in which the person receives the medical gas. A permitted wholesale distributor that provides oxygen to a permitted medical oxygen retail establishment that is out of compliance with only the change of location notice requirement under s. 499.833(3)(a) does not commit a violation of this paragraph if the wholesale distributor notifies the department of the transaction no later than the next business day; or
(d) Knowingly falsely creates a label for a medical gas or knowingly misrepresents a factual matter contained in a label for a medical gas.
(2) A person found guilty of an offense under this section, under the authority of the court convicting and sentencing the person, shall be ordered to forfeit to the state any real or personal property:
(a) Used or intended to be used to commit, to facilitate, or to promote the commission of such offense; and
(b) Constituting, derived from, or traceable to the gross proceeds that the defendant obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense.
(3) Property or assets subject to forfeiture under subsection (2) may be seized pursuant to a warrant obtained in the same manner as a search warrant or as otherwise authorized by law, and held until the case against a defendant is adjudicated. Moneys ordered forfeited, or proceeds from the sale of other assets ordered forfeited, shall be equitably divided between the department and other agencies involved in the investigation and prosecution that led to the conviction. Other property ordered forfeited after conviction of a defendant may, at the discretion of the investigating agencies, be placed into official use by the department or the agencies involved in the investigation and prosecution that led to the conviction.
History.s. 28, ch. 2014-89; s. 65, ch. 2015-2.

F.S. 499.92 on Google Scholar

F.S. 499.92 on Casetext

Amendments to 499.92


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 499.92
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S499.92 1a - DRUGS-MISBRANDED - ADULTERATE MISBRAND MED GAS WI DEFRAUD DECEIVE - F: T
S499.92 1b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - PUR REC MED GAS PRSN UNAUT DSTRB DISP MED GAS - F: T
S499.92 1c - FRAUD - ENGAGE WHOLESALE DISTRI MED GAS TO UNAUTH PRSN - F: T
S499.92 1d - FRAUD - CREATE MISREP FACT MATTR CONTAIN LABEL MED GAS - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 499.92

Total Results: 20

White v. Junior

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 219 So. 3d 230, 2017 WL 2131444, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7021

Snippet: Court in In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948): In order to be considered

Pole v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-08-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 198 So. 3d 961, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12036, 2016 WL 4197955

Snippet: cases of In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948), and Commonwealth v. Moody, 125

Noel Plank v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-03-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 190 So. 3d 594, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 93, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 553

Snippet: and even In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948), those cases predated the Supreme

State of Florida v. Alex Diaz de la Portilla

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-11-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 177 So. 3d 965, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 626, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2465, 2015 WL 6749921

Snippet: justified. In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 275, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948). This Court has also discussed

Palmer v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-03-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 159 So. 3d 1024, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4292, 2015 WL 1334328

Snippet: ” In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 275-76, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948) (holding that if some of the essential

Plank v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-01-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 130 So. 3d 289, 2014 WL 308012, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1358

Snippet: also In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 274-75, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948) (explaining that the right to

Dawson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 20 So. 3d 1016, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16841, 2009 WL 3763033

Snippet: counsel. In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948). We have considered appellant&

Fiore v. Athineos

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 9 So. 3d 1291, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6034, 2009 WL 1456872

Snippet: See In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 275, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948). As the United States Supreme

Woods v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-09-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 987 So. 2d 669

Snippet: later, in In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948), the Court further explained that

Rogers v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-08-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 963 So. 2d 328

Snippet: quot; In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948), "contemplates that the accused

Forbes v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-07-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 933 So. 2d 706

Snippet: ) (citing In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948), and finding no error in the trial

Jones v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-09-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 883 So. 2d 369

Snippet: re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, *373 268-269, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948). `[A]t the time of the adoption

Bryant v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-07-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 851 So. 2d 823

Snippet: quoting In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 275, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948)). Ms. Bryant's conduct did

Kelley v. Rice

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-10-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 800 So. 2d 247

Snippet: See In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948). *252 There is, however, an exception…expressed in In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682, and with our supreme court's more

Baber v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-08-31T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 775 So. 2d 258

Snippet: quot; In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948), cited in Chambers, 410 U.S. at

Williams v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-04-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 736 So. 2d 699

Snippet: In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 268-269, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948). "[A]t the time of the adoption

Martin v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-04-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 711 So. 2d 1173

Snippet: contemptuous. In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948); and Ex Parte Terry, 128 U.S.

Roundtree v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-03-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 651 So. 2d 1286

Snippet: thereof. See In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948); Cook v. United States, 267 U.

Hayes v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-01-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 592 So. 2d 327

Snippet: compelling In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948), in which the Court squarely held

Burdine-Coakley v. Capital Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-03-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 542 So. 2d 1019

Snippet: RALPH COLES, SR. (b) Checks in the amount of $12,499.92 on account no. XXXXXXXXX in the name of RALPH H