The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . which the customers could “use in the future purchase of merchandise.” 4-507 Collier on Bankruptcy P 507.09 . . . See also 4-507 Collier on Bankruptcy P 507.09 (describing the Columbia Law Review article as “[a]lso . . .
. . . Longo, 144 B.R. 305 (Bankr.D.Md.1992); and consumer purchases on layaway, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.09 . . . those consumers “left holding the bag” when a merchant files for bankruptcy. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.09 . . .
. . . Sommer, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.09 (16th Ed. Rev’d 07/2010). . . . claims although they seem to be out of the scope of the statutory language. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy at ¶ 507.09 . . . Id. at ¶ 507.09[1], There are situations that are clearly within the scope of the statute, such as, consumer . . . Id. at ¶ 507.09[2]. . . . Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.09[2][a] citing Guarracino v. Hoffman, 246 B.R. 130 (D.Mass.2000). . . .
. . . In re Grady, 180 B.R. 461, 464 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1995) (citations omitted); Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.09 . . .
. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶507.09[2], at 507-54 (15th ed. rev.2001) (“The result is that if a claim . . . Id.., ¶ 507.09, at 507-52.1. . . . Id., ¶ 507.09[2], at 507-54. .In this regard, the Court would part company with Bums, which rejected . . .
. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 507.09, at 507-52 (15th ed. rev.1999). . . .
. . . on balance of premium due March 1, 1939.. 10.84 ■(f) Balance of premium due March 1, 1939........... 507.09 . . .
. . . follows: Value of the policy $1452.00 1939 Dividend 12.68 1464.68 Policy Loan $415.00 Interest 92.09 507.09 . . .