Florida Statute 817.24 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 817
FRAUDULENT PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 817.24

817.24 Unlawful to add or alter or deface existing brand.—It is unlawful for anyone to add to or alter or deface any existing brand on any animal not his or her own or without the consent of the owner, with a fraudulent intent to claim the same, any bar, letter, figure, or character of any kind. Any violation of this section shall be a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.—ss. 1, 3, ch. 4734, 1899; GS 3334; RGS 5174; CGL 7277; s. 857, ch. 71-136; s. 1254, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 817.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 817.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 817.24

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 817.24

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S817.24 - FRAUD - ADD TO ALTER OR DEFACE EXISTING ANIMAL BRAND - F: T

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 817.24

Total Results: 6

Robinson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-02-01

Citation: 257 So. 2d 300, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7370

Snippet: tendency toward guilt.” King v. State, 156 Fla. 817, 24 So.2d 573; Hayward v. State, 152 Fla. 608, 12 So

Taylor v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-12-01

Citation: 241 So. 2d 426

Snippet: tendency toward guilt." King v. State, 156 Fla. 817, 24 So.2d 573. Therefore, if the times involved here

Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-08-11

Citation: 238 So. 2d 307

Snippet: reversible error appears. See King v. State, 156 Fla. 817, 24 So.2d 573 (1946), as to the conviction of buying

Lampley v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-09-24

Citation: 214 So. 2d 515

Snippet: tendency toward guilt." King v. State, 156 Fla. 817, 24 So.2d 573. See Romanello v. State, Fla.App. 1964

Brooks v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-10-27

Citation: 168 So. 2d 785

Snippet: Fla. 608, 12 So.2d 458; King v. State, 156 Fla. 817, 24 So.2d 573. Therefore, we hold that [under the peculiar

Channell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-10-01

Citation: 107 So. 2d 284

Snippet: 12 So.2d 458, and King v. State, 1946, 156 Fla. 817, 24 So.2d 573. There was testimony that, immediately