O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 10-5-3 (2019)
Citations to United States Code
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any citation in this chapter to a section of the United States Code
includes those statutes and the rules and regulations adopted under those statutes as in effect on July 1, 2009, or as later amended.
History
Code 1981, § 10-5-3, enacted by Ga. L. 2008, p. 381, § 1/SB 358.
Annotations
Code Commission notes. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in
2008, “July 1, 2009” was substituted for “the date of enactment of this chapter”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1988–2012 · leading case: Greenhill v. State, 404 S.E.2d 577 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).
Greenhill v. State, 404 S.E.2d 577 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). “Appellant represented himself at trial and the jury convicted him on 13 counts of the indictment for selling securities while neither appellant nor the security was registered, and for employing a device, scheme or artifice to defraud in connection with the sale of securities in…”
Mosley v. State, 560 S.E.2d 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). “1, 5, 9, 14, and 19), five violations of OCGA § 10-5-3 (nos. 2, 6, 10, 15, and 20), and five violations of OCGA § 10-5-12 (a) (2) (nos.”
Garvin v. Sec'y of State, 596 S.E.2d 166 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). “Garvin does not dispute that he was not registered to sell securities in Georgia pursuant to OCGA § 10-5-3, nor does he dispute that the contracts involved in the investment he described and sold to Kommor were not registered in Georgia as securities under OCGA § 10-5-5.”
Hicks v. State, 728 S.E.2d 294 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). “when [he] was not registered as a salesman of securities pursuant to OCGA § 10-5-3 (a) [(2000)] .” 4 Third, the indictment alleged that Hicks, in connection with an offer to sell and sale of a security engaged “in an act, practice, and course of business that would operate and…”
Thayer v. State, 375 S.E.2d 460 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988). “The fifth count involved defendant Thayer not being registered as a dealer or salesman under OCGA § 10-5-3. The remaining four counts concerned violations of OCGA § 10-5-12 (d) (1) under which it is unlawful for any person in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any…”
Cox v. Garvin, 607 S.E.2d 549 (Ga. 2005). “Garvin was not registered to sell securities in Georgia pursuant to OCGA § 10-5-3, nor were the contracts involved in the investment sold to Kommor registered in Georgia as securities under OCGA *904 § 10-5-5.”
Seale v. Miller, 698 F. Supp. 883 (N.D. Ga. 1988). “§ 10-5-3 and 10-5-5 relating to the defendants’ alleged failure to register the securities.”
Darryl Hicks v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). “when [he] was not registered as a salesman of securities pursuant to OCGA § 10-5-3 (a) [(2000)].” 4 Third, the indictment alleged that Hicks, 3 OCGA §§ 10-5-5 (a) (2000) (“It shall be unlawful for any person to offer for sale or to sell any securities to any person in this state…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.