O.C.G.A.
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 21-2-565, any person who shall make a false statement under oath or affirmation regarding any material matter or thing relating to any subject being investigated, heard, determined, or acted upon by any public official, in accordance with this chapter, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
History
Ga. L. 1894, p. 115, § 13; Penal Code 1895, § 625; Penal Code 1910, § 660; Code 1933, § 34-9901; Code 1933, § 34-
1901, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1.
Annotations
Cross references. False swearing generally, § 16-10-71.
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Fingerprinting not required. - An offense under O.C.G.A. § 21-2-560 would not be designated as one which requires
fingerprinting. 1998 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 98-20.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1992–2012 · leading case:
Jolley v. Grantham, 424 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).
Jolley v. Grantham, 424 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “OCGA §§ 21-2-560; 16-1-10. See generally 5 USCA § 7324 (a).”
Hogan v. State, 730 S.E.2d 178 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “OCGA § 21-2-560, which addresses the making of false statements generally, provides: Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 21-2-565, any person who shall make a false statement under oath or affirmation regarding any material matter or thing relating to any subject being…”
Vincent Hogan v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “2 OCGA § 21-2-560, which addresses the making of false statements generally, provides: “Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 21-2-265, any person who shall make a false statement under oath or affirmation regarding any material matter or thing relating to any subject…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.