Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
O.C.G.A. § 36-10-3 — 36-10-3 through 36-10-5 | Georgia Code
O.C.G.A. § 36-10-3 (2018) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Scholar Amendments

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Section 10. Public Works Contracts, 36-10-1 through 36-10-5.

ARTICLE 2 COUNTY GOVERNING AUTHORITIES

36-10-3 through 36-10-5.

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2000, p. 498, § 2, effective April 20, 2000.

Editor's notes.

- Former Code Sections 36-10-3 through 36-10-5, relating to contracts for public works, were based on Ga. L. 1878-79, p. 159, § 3, p. 160, §§ 2, 4; Code 1882, §§ 493b-493d; Ga. L. 1889, p. 49, § 1; Civil Code 1895, §§ 345, 346; Penal Code 1895, § 279; Civil Code 1910, §§ 388, 389; Penal Code 1910, § 283; Ga. L. 1920, p. 58, § 1; Code 1933, §§ 23-1703, 23-1704, 23-9904; Ga. L. 1939, p. 193, § 1; Ga. L. 1967, p. 547, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 954, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 2029, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 534, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 641, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 278, § 2; Ga. L. 1989, p. 356, § 5.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 36-10-3

O.C.G.A. § 36-10-3 (2018) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Scholar Amendments
2 resultsSort: Relevance · Newest · Treatment
Copy

·Faulk v. Twiggs Cnty., 504 S.E.2d 668 (Ga. 1998).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 21, 1998 | 269 Ga. 809

...656(1, 2), 87 S.E.2d 846 (1955). There is a statutory requirement that the County's contract with Epps result from the solicitation of public bids in advertisements appropriate to the proposed paving projects within the scope of the agreement. OCGA §§ 32-4-65, 36-10-3. A substantial compliance with this statutory requirement is sufficient. Pilcher v. English, 133 Ga. 496, 504, 66 S.E. 163 (1909) (construing OCGA § 36-10-3)....
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
CitedQuigg v. Georgia Professional Standards Commission. (2017)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityMattox v. Franklin County (2012)
Cited as authorityJerry Mattox v. Franklin County (2012)
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy

·Glynn Cnty. v. Teal, 345 S.E.2d 347 (Ga. 1986).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 16, 1986 | 256 Ga. 174

...It is also clear that the investment involved here is not insubstantial or de minimus. Under these facts, the trial court's conclusion that the construction of this miniature golf course is a public works contract is not error. Therefore, the county was obligated to comply with the notice provisions of OCGA § 36-10-3 and the judgment setting aside the contract was proper....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCredle v. East Bay Holding Co. (1994)
Cited (see also)City of Atlanta v. J. A. Jones Construction Co. (1990)
phrase: "see also"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →

Looking for more? Search the local case database for additional opinions mentioning this section:

Search GA case law for “36-10-3”Search nationallySyfertize ranking

This Georgia Code resource is curated by the attorney maintaining this site, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.