Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
O.C.G.A. § 36-67-1 — 36-67-1 through 36-67-6 | Georgia Code
O.C.G.A. § 36-67-1 (2018) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Scholar Amendments

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter 67 information not found

ARTICLE 2 DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES

36-67-1 through 36-67-6.

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2012, p. 351, §1/HB 1089, effective April 19, 2012.

Editor's notes.

- This chapter consisted of Code Sections 36-67-1 through 36-67-6, relating to zoning proposal review procedures, and was based on Ga. L. 1985, p. 1178, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2202, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 3017, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1473, § 1.

Cases Mentioning O.C.G.A. § 36-67-1

No pre-linked citations for this section yet. The cases below mention “36-67-1” in their text — found via local case database scan.

O.C.G.A. § 36-67-1 (2018) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Scholar Amendments
2 resultsSort: Relevance · Newest · Treatment
Copy

·Miller v. Fulton Cnty., 375 S.E.2d 864 (Ga. 1989).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 16, 1989 | 258 Ga. 882

...HUNT, Justice. This appeal involves the requirements for standing of neighbors challenging a rezoning. Miller filed a complaint against Fulton County and Julian LeCraw Properties (JLC) seeking injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Steinberg Act, OCGA § 36-67-1 et seq....
0 red0 yellow17 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityHENRY COUNTY v. GREATER ATLANTA HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, INC. (2026)
Cited as authorityT. Eleanor Davis v. Rockdale Art Farm, Inc. (2020)
Cited as authorityFred Milani v. Kathleen Irwin (2020)
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy

·Northridge Cmty. Ass'n v. Habersham at Northridge, 257 Ga. 722 (Ga. 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 6, 1988 | 363 S.E.2d 251

...In their six-count complaint, the neighbors argue the rezoning decision violates not only the state and federal constitutions, but also the Fulton County Zoning Resolution and the Zoning Proposal Review Procedures Act, the so-called “Steinberg Act”1 (OCGA § 36-67-1 et seq.). 1....
...The Act is referred to as the “Steinberg Act” for its primary sponsor, State Representative Cathey W. Steinberg of DeKalb County, who has taken a leading role in attempting to resolve zoning and land use problems in this state. In exceas of 100,000 and 400,000, respectively. OCGA § 36-67-1. “(1) Whether the zoning proposal will permit a use that is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent and nearby property; (2) Whether the zoning proposal will adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent o...
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCity of Roswell v. Outdoor Systems, Inc. (2001)
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →

Looking for more? Search the local case database for additional opinions mentioning this section:

Search GA case law for “36-67-1”Search nationallySyfertize ranking

This Georgia Code resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.