O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 51-4-4 (2019)

Wrongful death of child

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The right to recover for the homicide of a child shall be as provided in Code Section 19-7-1.

History

(Code 1933, § 105-1307, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1154, § 2.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For survey article on wills, trusts, guardianships, and fiduciary administration, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 447 (2007).

For note, ‘‘Not Just For Kids: Why Georgia’s Statutory Disinheritance of Deadbeat Parents Should Extend to Intestate Adults,’’ see 43 Ga. L. Rev. 867 (2009).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS ANALYSIS GENERAL CONSIDERATION General Consideration Limit on recovery. - Recovery for wrongful death in Georgia is limited to the full value of the life without deduction for necessary or personal expenses of decedent and does not include recovery for mental anguish or emotional distress. Ob-Gyn Assocs. v. Littleton, 259 Ga. 663, 386 S.E.2d 146 (1989), overruled on other grounds, Lee v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 272 Ga. 583, 533 S.E.2d 82 (2000), overruled on other grounds, Shores v. Modern Transp. Servs., 262 Ga. App. 293, 585 S.E.2d 664 (2003). Lack of standing. - Father lacked standing to recover for the child’s wrongful death pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 19-7-1(c) and 51-4-4 as the father had abandoned the child pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-7-1(b)(3); the father never supported the child, nor did the father ever visit the child in the many years after the child’s hospitalization in infancy, there was no evidence that the father attempted to learn where the child resided in order to initiate visitation or support, and the father was obligated under O.C.G.A. § 19-7-2 to support the child, even though the divorce decree did not require it.

Baker v. Sweat, 281 Ga. App. 863, 637 S.E.2d 474 (2006). The defense of accident is to be confined to its strict sense as an occurrence which takes place in the absence of negligence and for which no one would be liable, unless there is evidence authorizing a finding that the occurrence was an ‘‘accident’’ as thus defined, a charge on that defense is error. Battle v. Kovalski, 202 Ga. App. 471, 414 S.E.2d 700 (1992). Recovery by parent of deceased when murdered by spouse. - After the Georgia Supreme Court concluded that because the police officer, as the son’s wife and murderer, was precluded from recovery, the son’s mother had standing to assert claims for her son’s wrongful death and funeral expenses under Georgia law; therefore, the district court erred by dismissing the mother’s state law claims. Carringer v. Rodgers, 331 F.3d 844 (11th Cir. 2003). Nonresident alien parents. - Because nonresident alien parents of a decedent were entitled to bring an action under O.C.G.A. § 51-4-4, an administratrix did not have standing to pursue the action under O.C.G.A. § 51-4-5. Auto Doors, Inc.

v. Zivoluba, 277 Ga. App. 288, 626 S.E.2d 256 (2006). Divorced parent with custody entitled to cause of action for minor’s death. - The Georgia wrongful death statute in effect between April 4, 1979 and March 25, 1980 gave, at least by necessary implication, a right of action to the divorced parent who had custody of the child during the child’s minority, regardless of whether at the time of the death the child was a minor or sui juris. Cain v. Vontz, 703 F.2d 1279 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited in DeLoach v. Floyd, 160 Ga. App. 728, 288 S.E.2d 65 (1981); Childers v. Tauber, 160 Ga. App. 713, 288 S.E.2d 5 (1981); Adams v. Wright, 162 Ga. App. 550, 293 S.E.2d 446 (1982); Solomon v. Sapp, 169 Ga. App. 267, 312 S.E.2d 166 (1983); Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield, 171 Ga. App. 331, 319 S.E.2d 470 (1984); Stegman v. Horton Homes, Inc., 843 F. Supp. 707 (M.D. Ga. 1994).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Effect of death of beneficiary upon right of action under death statute, 13 ALR4th 1060. Recovery of damages for grief or mental anguish resulting from death of child - modern cases, 45 ALR4th 234. Excessive and adequacy of damages for personal injuries resulting in death of minor, 49 ALR4th 1076. Wrongful death: surviving parent’s minority as tolling limitation period on suit for child’s wrongful death, 54 ALR4th 362. Workers’ compensation act as precluding tort action for injury to or death of employee’s unborn child, 55 ALR4th 792.

Excessiveness or adequacy of damages awarded for parents’ noneconomic loss caused by personal injury or death of child, 61 ALR4th 413. Effect of death of beneficiary, following wrongful death, upon damages, 73 ALR4th 441. Recovery of damages for loss of consortium resulting from death of child - modern status, 77 ALR4th 411. Who, other than parent, may recover for loss of consortium on death of minor child, 84 ALR5th 687.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Carringer v. Rodgers, 578 S.E.2d 841 (Ga. 2003).
Carringer v. Rodgers, 578 S.E.2d 841 (Ga. 2003). · cites it 8× “" OCGA § 19-7-1(c) provides in pertinent part: (1) In every case of the homicide of a child, minor or sui juris, there shall be some party entitled to recover the full value of the life of the child, either as provided in this Code section or as provided in Chapter 4 of Title 51.”
Miles v. Ashland Chem. Co., 410 S.E.2d 290 (Ga. 1991). · cites it 4× “The individuals who may recover include: a surviving spouse, or if no surviving spouse a child or children may recover for the homicide of a parent, OCGA § 51-4-2(a), (b); a parent may recover for the homicide of a child, OCGA § 51-4-4; if no person is entitled to bring an…”
Dammarell v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 404 F. Supp. 2d 261 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 2× “” See Ga.Code Ann. § 51-4-4. The latter provi *277 sion incorporates by reference a subsection of Georgia’s domestic-relations code which declares that “[i]n every case of the homicide of a child, minor or sui juris, there shall be some party entitled to recover the full value…”
Abraham Et Al. v. Black., 816 S.E.2d 351 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “The Defendants argued that since the decedent's father was alive, he was the proper party under OCGA §§ 51-4-4 and 19-7-1 to bring the wrongful death suit and, thus, Black lacked standing.”
Cooksey v. Landry, 761 S.E.2d 61 (Ga. 2014). · cites it 4× “Cooksey, see OCGA § 51-1-27 and OCGA § 51-4-4, that the psychiatrist-patient privilege found in OCGA § 3 24-5-501 (a) impedes their right by protecting psychiatric-patient communications from disclosure, and therefore, the legal processes available to them provide an inadequate…”
Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield, 319 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “We note initially that while there was a wrongful death award made to the mother, punitive damages are not available in a wrongful death claim, Truelove v.”
South Fulton Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Poe, 480 S.E.2d 40 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “See OCGA § 51-4-4. OCGA § 51-4-1(1) states that the "`[f]ull value of the life of the decedent, as shown by the evidence' means the full value of the life of the decedent without deducting for any of the necessary or personal expenses of the decedent had he lived.”
Morris v. Chewning, 411 S.E.2d 891 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “" She then filed her motion to amend the complaint on November 14, 1990, and the trial court denied the motion on January 4, 1991. As appellant acknowledges, the right to recover for the full value of the life of the decedent, a minor child, lies in her parents, not in the…”
Blackstone v. Blackstone, 639 S.E.2d 369 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “[5] We reiterate that the parties assert that the only assets at issue are potential proceeds from a wrongful death and/or survival action.”
Littleton v. OB-GYN Assocs. of Albany, P.C., 385 S.E.2d 743 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “It is separate from the statutory wrongful death action for the full value of the life of the child, in which the parents are the surrogates of the child whose life was lost and who herself would be entitled to recover for the tort but cannot herself benefit from the…”
Roseberry v. Brooks, 461 S.E.2d 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “See also OCGA § 51-4-4. This amount “does not include recovery for mental anguish or emotional distress.”
Weldon v. Williams, 317 S.E.2d 570 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “544 (1) ( 186 SE 587 ) (1936); OCGA §§ 51-4-4; 19-7-1 (c)). Nevertheless, we hold that the defect of failure of the proper party to bring the action was cured by the post-verdict amendment naming as an additional party plaintiif the minor child “b/n/f Monica *592 Williams.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.