O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 8-3-332 (2019)

Criminal penalty

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

History

Code 1981, § 8-3-332, enacted by Ga. L. 1994, p. 471, § 1.

CHAPTER 4 CLEARANCE AND REHABILITATION OF BLIGHTED AREAS Sec.

Short title. Legislative findings and declaration of necessity. Definitions. Power of authorities to prepare redevelopment plans and to undertake redevelopment projects; scope of authorities’ powers, privileges, and immunities. Approval of redevelopment projects by cities. Power of authorities to make property available for use by private enterprise or public agencies; manner of valuation of property; obligations of purchasers and lessees.

Annotations

Cross references. Urban redevelopment plans generally, § 36-61-1 et seq.

Sec.

Taxation of leased property. Acquisition and development of lands not within blighted areas. Cooperation by state public bodies in aid of redevelopment projects. Financial aid from federal government; security for aid. Bonds and other obligations as legal investments and security. Investment in projects; acquisition, development, and sale of lands and improvements in project areas.

Development authorities of counties and municipalities, § 36-62-1 et seq.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. Proof of Facts. Blighted Area, 1 POF2d 401.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Omstead v. Bpg Inspection, LLC, 903 S.E.2d 7 (Ga. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Omstead v. Bpg Inspection, LLC, 903 S.E.2d 7 (Ga. 2024). · cites it 4× “Thus, we answer the first question posed on certiorari in the negative: the Court of Appeals did not err in approving a provision 9OCGA § 8-3-332, in turn, provides that those who violate OCGA § 8-3- 331 “shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.