Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-111 (2025)

  Official and facsimile ballots

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART VIII.  BALLOTS

 

     §11-111  Official and facsimile ballots.  Ballots issued by the chief election officer in state elections and by the clerk in county elections are official ballots.  In elections using the paper ballot and electronic voting systems, the chief election officer or clerk in the case of county elections shall have printed informational posters containing facsimile ballots that depict the official ballots to be used in the election. [L 1970, c 26, pt of §2; am L 1973, c 217, §1(ee); am L 1975, c 36, §1(4); am L 1980, c 264, §1(f); am L 2019, c 136, §15]

 

Cross References

 

  Ballot boxes, see §11-134.

  Spoiled ballots, see §11-140.

 

Case Notes

 

  Constitutional amendment ballot form found defective.  60 H. 324, 590 P.2d 543.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–1992 · leading case: State v. Christie, 766 P.2d 1198 (Haw. 1988).
State v. Christie, 766 P.2d 1198 (Haw. 1988). · cites it 3× “is, however, is not that the accessory in question provides an erratic or imprecise reference sample for verifying the accuracy of an Intoxilyzer; it is that the Department of Health “did not intend [to authorize the use of a Beam Attenuator] as an alternative method for an…”
State v. Ofa, 828 P.2d 813 (Haw. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “]” Section 11-111—2.1(k) of the Rules provides as follows: (k) The recommended calibration testing method shall use a minimum of two reference samples of known alcohol concentration at a known temperature within the range of one hundredths to thirty hundredths per cent weight…”
State v. Souza, 732 P.2d 253 (Haw. App. 1987). “” Based on our refinement of Nakahara , as set forth below, we hold that the State complied with § 11-111 -2(b) of the Rules. A. A fundamental rule of evidence is that before the result of a test made out of court may be introduced into evidence, a foundation must be laid…”
State v. Shoichi Nakahara, 704 P.2d 927 (Haw. App. 1985). “6 There was no evidence of Officer Thomas qualifying under section 11-111 4(1)(B) or (C) of the Rules.”
State v. Shivers, 730 P.2d 348 (Haw. App. 1986). “All renewal requests shall be submitted as required in § 11-111 -8(a) and (b). Relying on State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.