Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 67-8003 (2026)
Protection of private property.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Protection of private property.
(1) The attorney general shall establish, by October 1, 1994, an orderly, consistent process, including a checklist, that better enables a state agency or local government to evaluate proposed regulatory or administrative actions to assure that such actions do not result in an unconstitutional taking of private property. The attorney general shall review and update the process at least on an annual basis to maintain consistency with changes in law. All state agencies and local governments shall follow the guidelines of the attorney general.
(2) An owner of private property that is the subject of such action may submit a written request with the clerk or the agency or entity undertaking the regulatory or administrative action. Not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue, a state agency or local governmental entity shall prepare a written taking analysis concerning the action. Any regulatory taking analysis prepared hereto shall comply with the process set forth in this chapter, including use of the checklist developed by the attorney general pursuant to subsection (1) of this section and shall be provided to the private property owner no longer than forty-two (42) days after the date of filing the request with the clerk or secretary of the agency whose action is questioned. A regulatory taking analysis prepared pursuant to this section shall be considered public information.
(3) A governmental action is voidable if a written taking analysis is not prepared after a request has been made pursuant to this chapter. A private property owner, whose property is the subject of governmental action, affected by a governmental action without the preparation of a requested taking analysis as required by this section may seek judicial determination of the validity of the governmental action by initiating a declaratory judgment action or other appropriate legal procedure. A suit seeking to invalidate a governmental action for noncompliance with subsection (2) of this section must be filed in a district court in the county in which the private property owner’s affected private property is located. If the affected property is located in more than one (1) county, the private property owner may file suit in any county in which the affected private property is located.
(4) During the preparation of the taking analysis, any time limitation relevant to the regulatory or administrative actions shall be tolled. Such tolling shall cease when the taking analysis has been provided to the property owner. Both the request for a taking analysis and the taking analysis shall be part of the official record regarding the regulatory or administrative action.
(5) A private property owner is not required to submit a request under this chapter. The decision by the private property owner not to submit a request under this chapter shall not prevent or prohibit the private property owner from seeking any legal or equitable remedy including, but not limited to, the payment of just compensation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1993–2018 · leading case: N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 432 P.3d 976 (Idaho 2018).
N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 432 P.3d 976 (Idaho 2018). “3d 536 , 542 (2013) (citing *988 I.C. § 67-8003 ). As for the second prong, this Court held that a plaintiff must have sought compensation for the alleged taking through available state procedures.”
Highlands Dev. Corp. v. City of Boise, 188 P.3d 900 (Idaho 2008). “Section 67-6511(a) provides for amendment of the zoning ordinance and states, "An amendment of a zoning ordinance applicable to an owner's lands or approval of conditional rezoning or denial of a request for rezoning may be subject to the regulatory taking analysis provided for…”
Richard Hehr v. City of McCall, 305 P.3d 536 (Idaho 2013). “…permits, see I.C. §§ 67-6513, 67-6515, Greystone could have requested a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to I.C. § 67-8003. S.L. 2003, ch. 142, §§ 24. Idaho Code section 67-6513 specifically states, “Denial of a subdivision permit or approval of a subdivision permit…”
Buckskin Props., Inc. v. Valley Cnty., 300 P.3d 18 (Idaho 2013). “§ 67-6519(4)) or request a regulatory taking analysis pursuant to I.C. § 67-8003. I.C. § 67-6512(a). In this ease, Buckskin accompanied its application for development of The Meadows with a proposed capital contribution agreement.”
Johnson v. Blaine Cnty., 204 P.3d 1127 (Idaho 2009). “In addition, Section 67-6515 also provides, “Denial of a planned unit development permit or approval of a planned unit development permit with conditions unacceptable to the landowner may be subject to the regulatory taking analysis provided for by section 67-8003, Idaho Code,…”
Am. Civil Liberties Union, Idaho Chapter v. Echohawk, 857 P.2d 626 (Idaho 1993). “Section 67-8003: EXTENSION OF LEGAL INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE TO DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS BASED ON HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVIOR PROHIBITED.”
Alpine Vill. Co. v. City of McCall, 303 P.3d 617 (Idaho 2013). “n proposed regulatory or administrative actions to assure that such actions do not result in an unconstitutional taking of private property: Upon the "written request of an owner of real property that is the subject of such action, such request being filed with the clerk or the…”
In Re Application for Zoning Change, 96 P.3d 613 (Idaho 2004). “An amendment of a zoning ordinance applicable to an owner's lands or approval of conditional rezoning or denial of a request for rezoning may be subject to the regulatory taking analysis provided for by section 67-8003, Idaho Code, consistent with the requirements established…”
Brower v. Bingham Cnty. Commissioners, 96 P.3d 613 (Idaho 2004). “An amendment of a zoning ordinance applicable to an owner’s lands or approval of conditional rezoning or denial of a request for rezoning may be subject to the regulatory taking analysis provided for by section 67-8003, Idaho Code, consistent with the requirements established…”
No ID Bldg Cont Assoc v. City of Hayden (Idaho 2018). “3d 536, 542 (2013) (citing I.C. § 67-8003). As for the second prong, this Court held that 15 a plaintiff must have sought compensation for the alleged taking through available state procedures.”
— Idaho Code § 67-8003(2) — 2 cases
N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 432 P.3d 976 (Idaho 2018). “3d 536 , 542 (2013) (citing *988 I.C. § 67-8003 ). As for the second prong, this Court held that a plaintiff must have sought compensation for the alleged taking through available state procedures.”
No ID Bldg Cont Assoc v. City of Hayden (Idaho 2018). “3d 536, 542 (2013) (citing I.C. § 67-8003). As for the second prong, this Court held that 15 a plaintiff must have sought compensation for the alleged taking through available state procedures.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.