Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 7-908 (2026)

Award. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Award. 

(a) The award shall be in writing and signed by the arbitrators joining in the award. The arbitrators shall deliver a copy to each party personally or by registered mail, or as provided in the agreement.

(b)  An award shall be made within the time fixed therefor by the agreement or, if not so fixed, within such time as the court orders on application of a party. The parties may extend the time in writing either before or after the expiration thereof. A party waives the objection that an award was not made within the time required unless he notifies the arbitrators of his objection prior to the delivery of the award to him.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2005 · leading case: Campbell v. Kildew, 115 P.3d 731 (Idaho 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Campbell v. Kildew, 115 P.3d 731 (Idaho 2005). · cites it 2× “THE DALTOSOS HAVE STANDING TO BRING A RULE 60(b) MOTION Campbell and Kildew argue that the language of Idaho Code §§ 7-908 , 7-911, 7-912, and 7-913 indicates that arbitration and subsequent confirmation proceedings are only applicable to parties of the arbitration agreement and…”
Martel v. Bulotti, 65 P.3d 192 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 2× “Martel, on the other hand, contends that the architect was an arbitrator under the terms of the contract even though his decision could be appealed through further arbitration.”
Bingham Cnty. Comm'n v. Interstate Elec. Co., 697 P.2d 1195 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 7-908. Section 7-911 provides for confirmation of such an award, by court action.”
Cady v. Allstate Ins., 747 P.2d 76 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Apparently Cady did not avail herself of this option either.”
— Idaho Code § 7-908(a) — 1 case
Cady v. Allstate Ins., 747 P.2d 76 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987). “Apparently Cady did not avail herself of this option either.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.