Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 72-401 (2026)
Dependency — When determined.
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Dependency — When determined.
Dependency shall initially be determined as of the time of the accident causing the injury or of manifestation of an occupational disease for purposes of income benefits therefor, and as of the time of death for purposes of income benefits for death.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1961–1983 · leading case: Profitt v. DeAtley-Overman, Inc., 384 P.2d 473 (Idaho 1963).
Profitt v. DeAtley-Overman, Inc., 384 P.2d 473 (Idaho 1963). “The principal issue in this proceeding is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain an order of the Board suspending payment of compensation benefits to claimant under authority of I.C. § 72-401, because of his refusal to submit to medical examinations in order thereby to…”
In re Chavez, 658 P.2d 950 (Idaho 1983). “The benefits for death to which a dependent parent is entitled are determined under I.C. § 72-413. Because appeal is brought from the award to the claimant of attorney fees before the Industrial Commission, we also consider I.”
Hayes v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 658 P.2d 950 (Idaho 1983). “The benefits for death to which a dependent parent is entitled are determined under I.C. § 72-413. Because appeal is brought from the award to the claimant of attorney fees before the Industrial Commission, we also consider I.”
Earl v. Swift & Co., 467 P.2d 589 (Idaho 1970). “Swift suggests that a portion of I.C. § 72-401 supports its argument: “If an injured workman persists in insanitary, injurious or unreasonable practices which tend to imperil or retard his recovery, the board may, in its discretion, order the compensation of such workman to be…”
Collins v. Moyle, 358 P.2d 1035 (Idaho 1961). “Plaintiff was not asked to submit to an examination by defendant’s doctor, under I.C. § 72-401. The findings of the Board that the medical and hospital expenses incurred by plaintiff were reasonable, and that defendant was not prejudiced by the fact that plaintiff was treated by…”
Watts v. J. S. Young Co., 225 A.2d 865 (Md. 1967). “035 (1963); Idaho Code, § 72-401 (1949); 77 Pa. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.