620 ILCS 65/1

Short Title

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(620 ILCS 65/1)
    Sec. 1. Short Title. This Act may be cited as the O'Hare Modernization Act.
(Source: P.A. 93-450, eff. 8-6-03.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2009–2010 · leading case: City of Chicago v. PROLOGIS
City of Chicago v. PROLOGIS (2010) ill · cites it 2× “In April 2006, plaintiff filed a complaint for condemnation pursuant to article VII of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, sections 11 — 61—1 and 11 — 102—4 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11 — 61—1, 11-102-^ (West 2004)), and the O’Hare Modernization Act (620 ILCS 65/1…”
City of Chicago v. St. John's United Church of Christ (2010) illappct “In 2003, the Illinois legislature passed the O’Hare Modernization Act (Modernization Act) (620 ILCS 65/1 et seq. (West 2004)). Section 15 of the Modernization Act provided, among other things: “In addition to any other powers that the City may have, and notwithstanding any other…”
Village of Bensenville v. City of Chicago (2009) illappct “” In 2003, the Illinois General Assembly enacted the O’Hare Modernization Act (Act) (620 ILCS 65/1 et seq. (West 2006)). In its prefatory findings, the legislature determined that “O’Hare cannot efficiently perform its role in the State and national air transportation systems…”
City of Chicago v. Prologis (2010) ill · cites it 2× “In April 2006, plaintiff filed a complaint for condemnation pursuant to article VII of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, sections 11–61–1 and 11–102–4 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11–61–1, 11–102–4 (West 2004)), and the O’Hare Modernization Act (620 ILCS 65/1 et…”
City of Chicago v. St. John's United Church of Christ (2010) illappct “In 2003, the Illinois legislature passed the O'Hare Modernization Act (Modernization Act) (620 ILCS 65/1 et seq. (West 2004)). Section 15 of the Modernization Act provided, among other things: "In addition to any other powers that the City may have, and notwithstanding any other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.