ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 10
Illinois Compiled Statutes

740 ILCS 10/1 (2026)

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Illinois Antitrust Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 10/1) (from Ch. 38, par. 60-1)
    Sec. 1. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Illinois Antitrust Act.
(Source: Laws 1965, p. 1943.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Galvan v. Nw. Mem'l Hosp., 888 N.E.2d 529 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Galvan v. Nw. Mem'l Hosp., 888 N.E.2d 529 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs sued these hospitals for violations of the Antitrust Act (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2004)) and the Consumer Fraud Act.”
Alpha Sch. Bus Co., Inc. v. Wagner, 910 N.E.2d 1134 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “(Sunrise Transportation), 1 alleging, inter alia, violations of the Illinois Antitrust Act (the Antitrust Act) (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2006)) and the Illinois Trade Secrets Act (the Trade Secrets Act) (765 ILCS 1065/1 et seq.”
Batson v. Live Nation Ent., Inc., 746 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2014). “§ 14 ; 740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. He argues that a tie-in need not violate antitrust laws in order to offend a broader public policy against tying arrangements, at least for purposes of the Act.”
McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 720 N.E.2d 242 (Ill. 1999). “The federal court rule with respect to evidence of parallel conduct has been adopted in one Illinois case involving a claim under the Illinois Antitrust Act (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 1994)), which is based on the Sherman Act.”
Alarm Detection Sys., Inc. v. Vill. of Hinsdale, 761 N.E.2d 782 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “Count V alleged that the ordinance was an illegal restraint on trade in violation of the Illinois Antitrust Act (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 1998)). Count VI alleged that the ordinance deprived ADS of its constitutional right to due process under article I, section 2, of the…”
Edwards v. City of Henry, 924 N.E.2d 978 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “Edwards filed a single-count, pro se complaint against defendant City of Henry requesting damages for alleged violations of the Illinois Antitrust Act (Act) (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2006)). The City filed a “Motion to Dismiss and for Sanctions” claiming immunity under the…”
Appraisers Coalition v. Appraisal Inst., 845 F. Supp. 592 (N.D. Ill. 1994). · cites it 2× “In Count VII, Plaintiff Solano claims that the Defendants violated the Illinois Antitrust Act, 740 ILCS 10/1 to 10/11 (SmithHurd 1993). In Count VIII, Plaintiff Solano seeks relief for violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/1…”
Health Professionals, Ltd. v. Johnson, 791 N.E.2d 1179 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “(West 2000)) and the Illinois Antitrust Act (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2000)), and that its terms are unreasonably restrictive.”
Int'l Equip. Trading, Ltd. v. Illumina, Inc., 312 F. Supp. 3d 725 (E.D. Ill. 2018). “§§ 15 (a), 26 (Count II); and the Illinois Antitrust Act ("IAA"), 740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (Count V). IET claims Illumina's "predatory and anticompetitive conduct" in charging site licensing fees has been an attempt to "drive IET and other third-party resellers from the .”
State v. Hitachi, Ltd., 2021 IL App (1st) 200176 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2018). Following disputes with the claims administrator (administrator) as to its eligibility, the appellant, Stericycle, intervened in that action and filed a motion “for determination of valid clams,” requesting that the court “return [its] claims…”
Harris v. ChartOne, 841 N.E.2d 1028 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “(West 2000)), the Illinois Antitrust Act (740 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2000)), and various other states’ statutes governing acceus to medical records.”
Butler v. Jimmy John's Franchise, LLC, 331 F. Supp. 3d 786 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “; (2) the Illinois Antitrust Act, 740 ILCS 10/1, et seq. ; and (3) the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/1, et seq.”
Show all 40 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.