ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 92
Illinois Compiled Statutes

740 ILCS 92/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 92/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act.
(Source: P.A. 92-233, eff. 1-1-02.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: State ex rel. Leibowitz v. Fam. Vision Care, LLC, 2020 IL 124754 (Ill. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Leibowitz v. Fam. Vision Care, LLC, 2020 IL 124754 (Ill. 2020). “OPINION ¶1 This appeal involves a claim brought under the Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act (Act) (740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (West 2016)). The Act, which adopts nearly word for word a statute from California’s Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (see Cal.”
United States ex rel. Youn v. Sklar, 273 F. Supp. 3d 889 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “and the Illinois Insurance Claims Fraud Protection Act (“IICFPA”), 740 ILCS 92/1, et. seq. (doc. # 100: Fourth Amended Complaint (“4th Am.”
People ex rel. Fox v. State, 2023 IL App (4th) 220622 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “Family Vision Care, LLC, 2020 IL 124754 , ¶¶ 77-80 (upholding the qui tam provisions of the Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act (740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (West 2016)) because they were nearly identical to the Act, which was held constitutional in Scachitti).”
State ex rel. Leibowitz v. Fam. Vision Care, LLC, 2019 IL App (1st) 180697 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “OPINION ¶1 We are asked to decide two interrelated questions under the Insurance Claims Fraud Protection Act (Act) (740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (West 2016)): (i) whether the State can assign to a third party an injury to its sovereignty and (ii) whether the third party can derive…”
Advanced Physicians, S.C. v. Provena Glenwood Med. Imaging, 2018 IL App (3d) 170296 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Count I of the complaint alleged a violation of the Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act (Act) ( 740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (West 2006) ). Count II alleged violations of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act ( 815 ILCS 505/1 et seq.”
State of Illinois ex rel. Leibowitz v. Fam. Vision Care, LLC, 2019 IL App (1st) 180697 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “*756 ¶ 1 We are asked to decide two interrelated questions under the Insurance Claims Fraud Protection Act (Act) ( 740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (West 2016) ): (i) whether the State can assign to a third party an injury to its sovereignty and (ii) whether the third party can derive…”
State ex rel. Leibowitz v. Fam. Vision Care, LLC, 2020 IL 124754 (Ill. 2020). “OPINION ¶1 This appeal involves a claim brought under the Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act (Act) (740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (West 2016)). The Act, which adopts nearly word for word a statute from California’s Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (see Cal.”
Advanced Physicians, S.C. v. Provena Glenwood Med. Imaging, 2018 IL App (3d) 170296 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “Count I of the complaint alleged a violation of the Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act (Act) (740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (West 2006)). Count II alleged violations of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq.”
Gutman v. Chicago Vein Inst. (N.D. Ill. 2021). “, 2019 IL App (1st) 181560 - U, ¶ 16, appeal pending (Nov Term 2019) (citing 740 ILCS 92/1 et seq.) (“The Illinois General Assembly adopted the Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act (the ‘Act’) in 2001, imposing civil penalties for fraud against private insurance companies.”
United States of Am. v. Roseland Cmty. Hosp. Ass'n (N.D. Ill. 2023). “(“IFCA”), and the Illinois Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act, 740 ILCS 92/1 et seq. (“IICFPA”). Defendants each move to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b).”
United States v. Rossi (C.D. Ill. 2024). “§§ 3729–33, the Illinois False Claims Act (“IFCA”), 740 ILCS 175/1–8, and the Illinois Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act (“IICFPA”), 740 ILCS 92/1–45. The following allegations are drawn from Abdi’s original complaint, Abdi Compl.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.