ILCS » Chapter 815 · Act 513
Illinois Compiled Statutes

815 ILCS 513/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 513/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Home Repair and Remodeling Act.
(Source: P.A. 91-230, eff. 1-1-00.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2005–2022 · leading case: Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 4× “Defendant filed a response and a motion for summary judgment arguing that plaintiff's failure to comply with sections 20(a) and 30 of the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Home Repair Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2006)) barred him from asserting a lien upon her property.”
MD Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Abrams, 888 N.E.2d 54 (Ill. 2008). · cites it 2× “Defendants moved to dismiss the case pursuant to section 2-619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2-619(a)(9) (West 2006)), alleging plaintiff's failure to comply with the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq.”
Behl v. Gingerich, 920 N.E.2d 665 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 3× “Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, claiming plaintiff was precluded from recovering any amounts from him because plaintiff had violated the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 through 999 (West 2006)). The trial court denied defendant’s motion, and the case…”
K. Miller Const. Co., Inc. v. McGinnis, 913 N.E.2d 1147 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “In 2000, the Illinois legislature passed the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Home Repair Act or the Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2006)), declaring it "unlawful" for a contractor to "charge for remodeling or repair work before obtaining a signed contract or work order over…”
Cent. Illinois Elec. Servs., L.L.C. v. Slepian, 831 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 4× “The Slepians alleged in affirmative defense that because CIES violated the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (the Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq . (West 2002)), the oral contract for services was void and, therefore, could not form the basis of recovery under a mechanic’s lien.”
Smith v. Bogard, 879 N.E.2d 543 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “The Bogards filed a motion to dismiss, claiming Smith was precluded from recovery because he had violated various provisions of the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 through 999 (West 2004)). The trial court agreed with the Bogards and dismissed Smith’s…”
MD Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Abrams, 859 N.E.2d 1070 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint (see 735 ILCS 5/2— 619(a)(9) (West 2004)), contending that, because plaintiff had violated the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2004)), it could not recover.”
West Bend Mut. Ins. v. People, 929 N.E.2d 606 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “(West 2004)) and the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2004)). The Attorney General asked the court to enjoin Kafka and Father & Sons Contractors from engaging in home repairs and remodeling.”
Roberts v. Adkins, 921 N.E.2d 802 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Adkins filed counterclaims and raised the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2006)) as an affirmative defense.”
Fleissner v. Fitzgerald, 937 N.E.2d 1152 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “On March 18, 2009, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety pursuant to section 2 — 619(a)(9) of the Code because plaintiff violated provisions of the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2008)). Specifically, defendants…”
Tom Geise Plumbing, Inc. v. Taylor, 917 N.E.2d 1209 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “In June 2008, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing plaintiff violated the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 through 999 (West 2006)). In September 2008, the trial court (1) granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and (2) denied plaintiffs motion to…”
Peak Exteriors, LLC v. Goebel, 2021 IL App (2d) 200244-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “Defendant filed a counter complaint which, as 2021 IL App (2d) 200244-U amended, alleged breach of contract, breach of warranty, and violations of the Home Repair Remodeling Act (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2016)), the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815…”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.