Iowa Code » Chapter 1 — SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION OF THE STATE
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 1.13 (2026)

Existing trusts not affected

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in section 1.12, this section, or section 1.14 or 1.15 shall authorize the alienation, encumbrance, or taxation of any real or personal property, including water rights, belonging to any Indian or Indian tribe, band, or community that is held in trust by the United States or is subject to a restriction against alienation imposed by the United States; or shall authorize regulation of the use of such property in a manner inconsistent with any federal treaty, agreement, or statute or with any regulation made pursuant thereto; or shall confer jurisdiction upon the state to adjudicate, in probate proceedings or otherwise, the ownership or right to possession of such property or any interest therein. [C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §1.13] 2018 Acts, ch 1026, §2 Referred to in §1.14

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1973–2021 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Valentin Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572 (Iowa 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Iowa v. Valentin Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572 (Iowa 2013). · cites it 2× “” Model Penal Code § 1.13(2), 10A U.L.A. 90 (2001). Further, we are only required to find minimal support in the record in order to support a factual basis for .”
Iowa Dep't of Transp. v. Iowa Dist. Court for Scott Cnty., 587 N.W.2d 781 (Iowa 1998). · cites it 2× “Applicability of Section 1.13 (k). Section 4.13(4) provides that the repeal of a statute does not affect [a]ny investigation, proceeding or remedy in respect of any privilege, obligation, [or] liability .”
State v. Allen, 293 N.W.2d 16 (Iowa 1980). “See Model Penal Code § 1.13, Comment 1 (Tent. Draft No. 4,1955).”
State v. Lass, 228 N.W.2d 758 (Iowa 1975). “1962); Comments on Model Penal Code, § 1.13 at 114-117 (T.D. No. 4, 1955); Proposed Federal Criminal Code, Study Draft, § 103(4) and Comment pp.”
Anderson v. Boeke, 491 N.W.2d 182 (Iowa Ct. App. 1992). “92-181, § 1.13 , 85 Stat. 587 (1971), codified in 12 U.”
Frederick v. Men's Reformatory at Anamosa, 203 N.W.2d 797 (Iowa 1973). “See rule 9, Rules of Civil Procedure; Loth, Iowa Rules of Civil Procedure, § 1.13 (Second Ed.). Moreover, the State is the putative employer.”
EMC Ins. Grp., Inc. v. Gregory M. Shepard (Iowa 2021). · cites it 2× “Section 1.13 notified shareholders that book-entry shares would be cancelled after the holder received Merger Consideration.”
EMC Ins. Grp., Inc. v. Gregory M. Shepard (Iowa 2021). · cites it 2× “Section 1.13 notified shareholders that book-entry shares would be cancelled after the holder received Merger Consideration.”
— Iowa Code § 1.13(2) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Valentin Velez, 829 N.W.2d 572 (Iowa 2013). “” Model Penal Code § 1.13(2), 10A U.L.A. 90 (2001). Further, we are only required to find minimal support in the record in order to support a factual basis for .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.