Iowa Code » Chapter 1 — SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION OF THE STATE
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 1.14 (2026)

Tribal ordinances or customs enforced

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any tribal ordinance or custom adopted by the governing council of the Sac and Fox Indian settlement in Tama county in the exercise of any authority which it may possess shall, if not inconsistent with any applicable civil law of the state, be given full force and effect in the determination of civil causes of action pursuant to sections 1.12, 1.13, this section, and 1.15. [C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §1.14] 2018 Acts, ch 1026, §3; 2019 Acts, ch 59, §1 Referred to in §1.13

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2021 · leading case: Hardy v. Grant Twp. Trs., Adams Cnty., 357 N.W.2d 623 (Iowa 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hardy v. Grant Twp. Trs., Adams Cnty., 357 N.W.2d 623 (Iowa 1984). “2d Eminent Domain § 19 (1966); Nichols, Eminent Domain § 1.14[2] (1981). Iowa Code section 359.28 provides the requisite authority for township trustees to exercise the power of eminent domain.”
In Re Holst, 192 B.R. 194 (Bankr. D. Iowa 1996). “” (Prototype, § 1.14). As the rollover contribution is an employee contribution maintained by the trustee under the Plan, it is a benefit provided under the Plan.”
State of Iowa v. Alan James Kuuttila (Iowa 2021). “§ 1.14. Boeckman was not an authorized solid waste collector, and he acted unlawfully and thus unreasonably in seizing and searching Kuuttila’s trash without a warrant.”
Reilly Constr. Co., Inc., plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant v. Bachelder, Inc., defendant-appellant/cross-appellee. (Iowa Ct. App. 2015). “Perillo, Corbin on Contracts § 1.14 at 38 (rev. ed. 1993). The fact that the designated location on Bachelder’s land was not a suitable place for a pond constituted a breach of Reilly’s warranty that he could build a pond at that site.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.