Iowa Code » Chapter 476 — PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATION
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 476.12 (2026)

Rehearings before commission

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding the Iowa administrative procedure Act, chapter 17A, any party, as defined in the rules and regulations promulgated by the commission as provided in section 476.2, to a contested case before the commission may within twenty days after the issuance of the final decision apply for a rehearing. The commission shall either grant or refuse an application for rehearing within thirty days after the filing of the application, or may after giving the\n\nTue Dec 09 22:08:33 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 476 (110, 2) §476.12, PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATION 22\n\ninterested parties notice and opportunity to be heard and after consideration of all the facts, including those arising since the making of the order, abrogate or modify its order. A failure by the commission to act upon the application for rehearing within the above period shall be deemed a refusal of the application. Neither the filing of an application for rehearing nor the granting of the application shall stay the effectiveness of an order unless the commission so directs. [C66, 71, 73, 75, §490A.12; C77, 79, 81, §476.12] 88 Acts, ch 1100, §2; 2003 Acts, ch 44, §114; 2024 Acts, ch 1170, §369 Referred to in §478.32, 479.32, 479B.22

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2001 · leading case: Teleconnect Co. v. U.S. West Commc'ns, Inc., 508 N.W.2d 644 (Iowa 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Teleconnect Co. v. U.S. West Commc'ns, Inc., 508 N.W.2d 644 (Iowa 1993). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 476.12 . Judicial review of the board’s decision is provided in Iowa district court.”
S.E. Iowa Coop. Elec. Ass'n v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 633 N.W.2d 814 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 2× “4 as a paramount consideration for the Board to balance in considering whether an electric transmission line franchise is necessary to serve the public use.”
Se Iowa Co-op. Elec. v. Iowa Util. Bd., 633 N.W.2d 814 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 2× “4 as a paramount consideration for the Board to balance in considering whether an electric transmission line franchise is necessary to serve the public use.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.