Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 901.5 (2026)

Pronouncing judgment and sentence

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

After receiving and examining all pertinent information, including the presentence investigation report and victim impact statements, if any, the court shall consider the following sentencing options. The court shall determine which of them is authorized by law for the offense, and of the authorized sentences, which of them or which combination of them, in the discretion of the court, will provide maximum opportunity for the rehabilitation of the defendant, and for the protection of the community from further offenses by the\n\nTue Dec 09 21:52:34 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 901 (36, 0) §901.5, JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING PROCEDURES 4\n\ndefendant and others. At the time fixed by the court for pronouncement of judgment and sentence, the court shall act accordingly: 1. If authorized by section 907.3, the court may defer judgment and sentence for an indefinite period in accordance with chapter 907. 2. If the defendant is not an habitual offender as defined by section 902.8, the court may pronounce judgment and impose a fine. 3. The court may pronounce judgment and impose a fine or sentence the defendant to confinement, or both, and suspend the execution of the sentence or any part of it as provided in chapter 907. 4. The court may pronounce judgment and impose a fine or sentence the defendant to confinement, or both. 5. If authorized by section 907.3, the court may defer the sentence and assign the defendant to the judicial district department of correctional services. 6. The court may pronounce judgment and sentence the defendant to confinement and then reconsider the sentence as provided by section 902.4 or 903.2. 7. The court shall inform the defendant of the mandatory minimum sentence, if one is applicable. 8. The court may order the defendant to complete any treatment indicated by a substance use disorder evaluation ordered pursuant to section 901.4A or any other section. 9. a. The court shall order DNA profiling of a defendant convicted of an offense that requires profiling under section 81.2. b. Notwithstanding section 81.2, the court may order the defendant to provide a DNA sample to be submitted for DNA profiling if appropriate. In determining the appropriateness of ordering DNA profiling, the court shall consider the deterrent effect of DNA profiling, the likelihood of repeated offenses by the defendant, and the seriousness of the offense. 10. If the defendant is being sentenced for an aggravated misdemeanor or a felony, the court shall publicly announce the following: a. That the defendant’s term of incarceration may be reduced from the maximum sentence because of statutory earned time, work credits, and program credits. b. That the defendant may be eligible for parole before the sentence is discharged. c. In the case of multiple sentences, whether the sentences shall be served consecutively or concurrently. 11. In addition to any sentence or other penalty imposed against the defendant for an offense under chapter 124, the court shall consider the provisions of 21 U.S.C. §862, regarding the denial of federal benefits to drug traffickers and possessors convicted under state or federal law, and may enter an order specifying the range and scope of benefits to be denied to the defendant, according to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. §862. For the purposes of this subsection, “federal benefit” means the issuance of any grant, contract, loan, professional license, or commercial license provided by an agency of the United States or through the appropriation of funds of the United States, but does not include any retirement, welfare, social security, health, disability, veterans, public housing, or similar benefit for which payments or services are required for eligibility. The supreme court may adopt rules establishing sentencing guidelines consistent with this subsection and 21 U.S.C. §862. The clerk of the district court shall send a copy of any order issued pursuant to this subsection to the denial of federal benefits program of the United States department of justice, along with any other forms and information required by the department. 12. In addition to any sentence or other penalty imposed against the defendant for an offense under chapter 124, the court shall consider the denial of state benefits to the defendant, and may enter an order specifying the range and scope of benefits to be denied to the defendant, comparable to the federal benefits denied under subsection 11. For the purposes of this subsection, “state benefit” means the issuance of any grant, contract, loan, professional license, or commercial license provided by a state agency, department, program, or otherwise through the appropriation of funds of the state, but does not include any retirement, welfare, health, disability, veterans, public housing, or similar benefit. The supreme court may adopt rules establishing sentencing guidelines consistent with this subsection and comparable to the guidelines for denial of federal benefits in 21 U.S.C.

\n

Tue Dec 09 21:52:34 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 901 (36, 0) 5 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING PROCEDURES, §901.7\n\n§862. The clerk of the district court shall send a copy of any order issued pursuant to this subsection to each state agency, department, or program required to deny benefits pursuant to such an order. 13. In addition to any other sentence or other penalty imposed against the defendant, the court shall impose a special sentence if required under section 903B.1 or 903B.2. 14. Notwithstanding any provision in section 907.3 or any other provision of law prescribing a mandatory minimum sentence for the offense, if the defendant, other than a child being prosecuted as a youthful offender, is guilty of a public offense other than a class “A” felony, and was under the age of eighteen at the time the offense was committed, the court may suspend the sentence in whole or in part, including any mandatory minimum sentence, or with the consent of the defendant, defer judgment or sentence, and place the defendant on probation upon such conditions as the court may require. [C79, 81, §901.5] 84 Acts, ch 1063, §1; 86 Acts, ch 1178, §3; 90 Acts, ch 1251, §65; 92 Acts, ch 1023, §1; 96 Acts, ch 1218, §68; 98 Acts, ch 1073, §9; 98 Acts, ch 1138, §26; 2000 Acts, ch 1122, §3; 2000 Acts, ch 1173, §2, 10; 2001 Acts, ch 165, §3; 2003 Acts, ch 109, §1; 2003 Acts, ch 156, §8; 2003 Acts, ch 179, §77; 2004 Acts, ch 1101, §93; 2005 Acts, ch 58, §1; 2005 Acts, ch 158, §14, 19, 37; 2006 Acts, ch 1101, §16; 2011 Acts, ch 38, §30; 2013 Acts, ch 30, §223; 2013 Acts, ch 42, §14; 2018 Acts, ch 1172, §102, 104; 2023 Acts, ch 19, §1325 Referred to in §232.8, 462A.14, 602.8103, 707.6A, 708.2D, 901.5B, 902.13, 907.3 Modification of no-contact orders, §664A.5 Fines, see chapter 909 Surcharge on penalty, chapter 911

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 499 cases (195 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson, 890 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 2017).
State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson, 890 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 185× “42, § 14 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (14) (2014)). That law provides, Notwithstanding any provision in section 907.”
State of Iowa v. Evan Paul Headley, 926 N.W.2d 545 (Iowa 2019). · cites it 12× “Iowa Code § 901.5 . The word "including" indicates that a PSI contains, or is itself, "pertinent information.”
State of Iowa v. Kevin Duane Fisher II, 877 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa 2016). · cites it 11× “1218, § 68 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (10)(a)). This takes care of the double jeopardy problem but does not alter our prior view that revoking the driver’s license of a person convicted of a drug possession offense is a punitive rather than a regulatory consequence.”
State of Iowa v. Sayvon Andre Propps, 897 N.W.2d 91 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 12× “Iowa Code § 901.5 . However, in the case of a forcible felony, the section does not apply.”
State v. Hildebrand, 280 N.W.2d 393 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 24× “) Section 901.5 provides: After receiving and examining all pertinent information, including the presentence investigation report, if any, the court shall consider the following sentencing options.”
State v. Peterson, 327 N.W.2d 735 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 64× “Section 901.5 is only a general or summary statute providing a procedure or framework for pronouncing judgment and sentence.”
State of Iowa v. Christopher Ryan Lee Roby, 897 N.W.2d 127 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 8× “42, § 14 (now codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (14)) (“Notwithstanding any provision .”
State v. Lyle, 854 N.W.2d 378 (Iowa 2014). · cites it 8× “42, § 14 (codified at Iowa Code Ann. § 901.5 (14) (West, West-law current through 2014 Reg.”
State v. Nail, 743 N.W.2d 535 (Iowa 2007). · cites it 8× “14(1) must be read in the context of our body of criminal law, the general sentencing provisions of criminal law in Iowa Code section 901.5 apply. That provision vests the district court with wide discretion in and general criteria for imposing sentences.”
State v. Daniel, 574 N.W.2d 333 (Iowa 1998). · cites it 37× “” Iowa Code § 901.5 (10). The language in section 124.”
State of Iowa v. Bradley Steven Graham, 897 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 6× “At the resentencing hearing, Graham’s counsel argued that under Iowa Code section 901.5(14) (2015), the judge could suspend any part of a juvenile’s sentence in *479 whole or in part, including the special sentence of lifetime parole.”
State v. McCright, 569 N.W.2d 605 (Iowa 1997). · cites it 10× “See Iowa Code § 901.5 (10) (“[T]he court shall order the state department of transportation to revoke the defendant’s driver’s license .”
— Iowa Code § 901.5(1) — 6 cases
State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson, 890 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 2017). “42, § 14 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (14) (2014)). That law provides, Notwithstanding any provision in section 907.”
State of Iowa v. Damario Johnson (Iowa Ct. App. 2016).
State of Iowa v. Montez Guise (Iowa Ct. App. 2018).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(10) — 13 cases
State of Iowa v. Kevin Duane Fisher II, 877 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa 2016). “1218, § 68 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (10)(a)). This takes care of the double jeopardy problem but does not alter our prior view that revoking the driver’s license of a person convicted of a drug possession offense is a punitive rather than a regulatory consequence.”
State v. Daniel, 574 N.W.2d 333 (Iowa 1998). “” Iowa Code § 901.5 (10). The language in section 124.”
State v. McCright, 569 N.W.2d 605 (Iowa 1997). “See Iowa Code § 901.5 (10) (“[T]he court shall order the state department of transportation to revoke the defendant’s driver’s license .”
State v. Bell, 572 N.W.2d 910 (Iowa 1997).
State v. Meyer, 705 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa Ct. App. 2005).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(10)(a) — 1 case
State v. Meyer, 705 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa Ct. App. 2005).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(10)(a)(1) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Ricky Andre Carter (Iowa Ct. App. 2019).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(10)(b) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 901.5(12) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 901.5(13) — 6 cases
State of Iowa v. Just. Mathis (Iowa Ct. App. 2026).
State of Iowa v. Tyden Daniel Clark (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(14) — 24 cases
State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson, 890 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 2017). “42, § 14 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (14) (2014)). That law provides, Notwithstanding any provision in section 907.”
State of Iowa v. Bradley Steven Graham, 897 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa 2017). “At the resentencing hearing, Graham’s counsel argued that under Iowa Code section 901.5(14) (2015), the judge could suspend any part of a juvenile’s sentence in *479 whole or in part, including the special sentence of lifetime parole.”
State of Iowa v. Merrill Lee Howard (Iowa Ct. App. 2016).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(2) — 4 cases
State v. Peterson, 327 N.W.2d 735 (Iowa 1982). “Section 901.5 is only a general or summary statute providing a procedure or framework for pronouncing judgment and sentence.”
State of Iowa v. Julie Ann Breeding (Iowa Ct. App. 2019).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(3) — 18 cases
State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson, 890 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 2017). “42, § 14 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (14) (2014)). That law provides, Notwithstanding any provision in section 907.”
State v. Klein, 574 N.W.2d 347 (Iowa 1998).
State v. Ayers, 590 N.W.2d 25 (Iowa 1999).
State v. Formaro, 638 N.W.2d 740 (Iowa 2002).
State v. Chana, 476 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa 1991).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(4) — 2 cases
State v. Jackson, 488 N.W.2d 701 (Iowa 1992).
State v. Cullum (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(5) — 2 cases
State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson, 890 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 2017). “42, § 14 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (14) (2014)). That law provides, Notwithstanding any provision in section 907.”
— Iowa Code § 901.5(7) — 6 cases
State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson, 890 N.W.2d 609 (Iowa 2017). “42, § 14 (codified at Iowa Code § 901.5 (14) (2014)). That law provides, Notwithstanding any provision in section 907.”
State v. Ross, 729 N.W.2d 806 (Iowa 2007).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(7A) — 4 cases
State v. Hall, 740 N.W.2d 200 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
State of Iowa v. John Michael Olney (Iowa Ct. App. 2014).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(7A)(a) — 1 case
State v. Hall, 740 N.W.2d 200 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(8) — 3 cases
State v. Hutt, 548 N.W.2d 897 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996).
State v. Foster, 511 N.W.2d 398 (Iowa 1994).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(8A) — 1 case
State v. Shearon, 660 N.W.2d 52 (Iowa 2003).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(8A)(a) — 4 cases
State of Iowa v. Joshua Scott Pearson, 876 N.W.2d 200 (Iowa 2016).
State v. Shearon, 660 N.W.2d 52 (Iowa 2003).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(9) — 5 cases
State v. Johnson, 513 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1994).
State of Iowa v. Nicole Ann Siders (Iowa Ct. App. 2016).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(9)(a) — 3 cases
— Iowa Code § 901.5(9)(b) — 1 case
State v. Johnson, 513 N.W.2d 717 (Iowa 1994).
— Iowa Code § 901.5(9)(c) — 5 cases
State of Iowa v. Todd Orrin Grant (Iowa Ct. App. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.