Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 17-2706 (2026)
Professional corporation law; citation
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
17-2706. Professional corporation law; citation. This act may be cited as "the professional corporation law of Kansas."
History: L. 1965, ch. 157, § 1; June 30.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Early Detection Ctr., Inc. v. Wilson, 811 P.2d 860 (Kan. 1991).
Early Detection Ctr., Inc. v. Wilson, 811 P.2d 860 (Kan. 1991). “In 1965, the legislature enacted the Professional Corporation Law, K.S.A. 17-2706 et seq. K.S.A. 17-2707 states: “As used in this act, unless the context clearly indicates that a different meaning is intended, the following words mean: “(a) ‘Professional corporation,’ a…”
Cent. Kansas Med. Ctr. v. Hatesohl, 425 P.3d 1253 (Kan. 2018). “, and the Professional Corporation Law of Kansas (PC Law), K.S.A. 17-2706 et seq. L. 1957, ch. 343, § 1 (HAA); L.”
St. Francis Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Weiss, 869 P.2d 606 (Kan. 1994). “; the Professional Corporation Law of Kansas, K.S.A. 17-2706 et seq.; the General Corporation Code, K.”
Schaefer & Assocs., P.A. v. Schirmer, 590 P.2d 1087 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “Plaintiff is a professional corporation organized pursuant to K.S.A. 17-2706 et seq. At the time of organization, Robert J.”
Galvan v. McCollister, 580 P.2d 1324 (Kan. 1978). “) Plaintiff also argues McCollister is liable because of the fact he is an attorney and is jointly liable for the acts of his fellow attorneys, citing the professional corporation law of Kansas, K.S.A. 17-2706, et seq. The argument has no merit.”
Abbey v. Kansas Bd. of Examiners in Optometry (Kan. Ct. App. 2024). “K.S.A. 17-2706 et seq. When seeking to form a professional corporation, the licensees forming the corporation must include a certificate from the regulating board of the profession involved showing "that each of the incorporators is duly licensed to practice that profession.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.