History:
L. 1988, ch. 47, § 1; L. 1990, ch. 97, § 2; Repealed, L. 1992, ch. 298, § 97; Repealed, L. 1993, ch. 291, § 283; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Whether house arrest constitutes imprisonment under section and constitutionality of section examined. State v. Scherzer, 254 Kan. 926, 927, 933, 937, 939, 869 P.2d 729 (1994).
2. Whether blood test results requested by defendant's physician in vehicular homicide case are subject to physician-patient privilege examined. State v. Mendoza, 20 Kan. App. 2d 541, 543, 889 P.2d 1147 (1995).
State v. Scherzer, 869 P.2d 729 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 10ד: The defendant pled guilty to three counts of vehicular battery, K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b, a class A misdemeanor.”
State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004). “The court concluded that because the legislature used different language in two comparable statutes, K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b(b)(2) (repealed 1993) and K.”
State v. Huser, 959 P.2d 908 (Kan. 1998). · cites it 2דPrior to 1993, the appropriate charge in a case of this nature would have been vehicular battery, under K.S.A. 21-3405b. A conviction under that statute required a showing that the defendant unintentionally caused bodily harm to another while driving under the influence of…”
State v. McCarley, 195 P.3d 230 (Kan. 2008). “We declared the sentence imposed illegal because it did not conform to the statutory provision and remanded to the district court for correction, i.”
State v. Barajas, 230 P.3d 784 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “The State argued in Huser that following the 1993 repeal of Kansas’ vehicular batteiy statute, K.S.A. 21-3405b, and simultaneous amendments to the Kansas batteiy statutes, drunk drivers who caused bodily injury could be convicted of reckless aggravated batteiy absent a showing…”
State v. Scott, 961 P.2d 667 (Kan. 1998). “2d 729 (1994), where the place of confinement required by K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b was claimed to be unconstitutional by comparison with the punishments imposed for more serious offenses, we rejected the contention and said: “The concern addressed in Freeman is disparity in…”
State v. Strand, 933 P.2d 713 (Kan. 1997). “In deciding that house arrest was not an available disposition under K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b(b)(2), Justice Lockett recognized in Scherzer that K.”
State v. Mendoza, 889 P.2d 1147 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 3ד) An examination of the complaint filed against defendant indicates that this was a prosecution for the violation of K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b and not a “prosecution for the violation of K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3405b(a) — 1 case
State v. Mendoza, 889 P.2d 1147 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “) An examination of the complaint filed against defendant indicates that this was a prosecution for the violation of K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b and not a “prosecution for the violation of K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3405b(b)(2) — 3 cases
State v. Scherzer, 869 P.2d 729 (Kan. 1994). “: The defendant pled guilty to three counts of vehicular battery, K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b, a class A misdemeanor.”
State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004). “The court concluded that because the legislature used different language in two comparable statutes, K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b(b)(2) (repealed 1993) and K.”
State v. Strand, 933 P.2d 713 (Kan. 1997). “In deciding that house arrest was not an available disposition under K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3405b(b)(2), Justice Lockett recognized in Scherzer that K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.