Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-3513 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-3513.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3513; L. 1986, ch. 120, § 1; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 28; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 50; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 25; L. 2006, ch. 212, § 12; L. 2010, ch. 109, § 10; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 30, § 288; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1977–2014 · leading case: State v. Williams, 329 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2014).
State v. Williams, 329 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2014). “Aggravated Trafficking Is Not The Same As, Promoting Prostitution In two related issues, Williams seeks to have his criminal activity treated as the criminal offense of promoting prostitution, defined in K.S.A. 21-3513, rather than aggravated trafficking.”
State v. Williams, 257 P.3d 849 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “21-3447(a)(2), but it is not an element of K.S.A. 21-3513. Finally, K.S.A. 21-3513(a)(7) prohibits “transporting a person within this state,” while K.”
State v. Dodson, 565 P.2d 291 (Kan. 1977). “The complaint filed against defendant charged promoting prostitution in violation of K.S.A. 21-3513 in that defendant: . . did participate in the maintenance of a house of prostitution, located at 5200 West 20th Street Terrace, Apt.”
State v. Spencer, 248 P.3d 256 (Kan. 2011). “21-3506(a)(1) and (a)(2) (aggravated criminal sodomy); K.S.A. 21-3513 (promoting prostitution); K.”
State v. Hayes, 597 P.2d 268 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “21-3710), promoting prostitution (K.S.A. 21-3513), and perjury (K.S.A. 21-3805).”
— K.S.A. § 21-3513(a) — 2 cases
State v. Williams, 329 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2014). “Aggravated Trafficking Is Not The Same As, Promoting Prostitution In two related issues, Williams seeks to have his criminal activity treated as the criminal offense of promoting prostitution, defined in K.S.A. 21-3513, rather than aggravated trafficking.”
State v. Williams, 257 P.3d 849 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “21-3447(a)(2), but it is not an element of K.S.A. 21-3513. Finally, K.S.A. 21-3513(a)(7) prohibits “transporting a person within this state,” while K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3513(a)(4) — 2 cases
State v. Williams, 329 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2014). “Aggravated Trafficking Is Not The Same As, Promoting Prostitution In two related issues, Williams seeks to have his criminal activity treated as the criminal offense of promoting prostitution, defined in K.S.A. 21-3513, rather than aggravated trafficking.”
State v. Williams, 257 P.3d 849 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “21-3447(a)(2), but it is not an element of K.S.A. 21-3513. Finally, K.S.A. 21-3513(a)(7) prohibits “transporting a person within this state,” while K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3513(a)(7) — 2 cases
State v. Williams, 329 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2014). “Aggravated Trafficking Is Not The Same As, Promoting Prostitution In two related issues, Williams seeks to have his criminal activity treated as the criminal offense of promoting prostitution, defined in K.S.A. 21-3513, rather than aggravated trafficking.”
State v. Williams, 257 P.3d 849 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “21-3447(a)(2), but it is not an element of K.S.A. 21-3513. Finally, K.S.A. 21-3513(a)(7) prohibits “transporting a person within this state,” while K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3513(b) — 1 case
State v. Williams, 329 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2014). “Aggravated Trafficking Is Not The Same As, Promoting Prostitution In two related issues, Williams seeks to have his criminal activity treated as the criminal offense of promoting prostitution, defined in K.S.A. 21-3513, rather than aggravated trafficking.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3513(b)(3) — 2 cases
State v. Williams, 329 P.3d 400 (Kan. 2014). “Aggravated Trafficking Is Not The Same As, Promoting Prostitution In two related issues, Williams seeks to have his criminal activity treated as the criminal offense of promoting prostitution, defined in K.S.A. 21-3513, rather than aggravated trafficking.”
State v. Williams, 257 P.3d 849 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “21-3447(a)(2), but it is not an element of K.S.A. 21-3513. Finally, K.S.A. 21-3513(a)(7) prohibits “transporting a person within this state,” while K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.