Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-4606a (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-4606a.
History: L. 1984, ch. 119, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 123, § 7; L. 1989, ch. 92, § 3; L. 1990, ch. 100, § 5; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 241; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases, 1985–2001 · leading case: State v. VanReed, 777 P.2d 794 (Kan. 1989).
State v. VanReed, 777 P.2d 794 (Kan. 1989). “VanReed performed various odd jobs for Walter and Marilyn Thomas at their home in Leawood, Kansas. On July 16, 1987, Marilyn Thomas discovered that several valuable jewelry items were missing.”
State v. Tittes, 784 P.2d 359 (Kan. 1989). “The district court sentenced the defendant to one to two years and denied his motion for probation under K.S.A. 21-4606a. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court in an unpublished opinion filed May 19, 1989.”
State v. Turner, 833 P.2d 921 (Kan. 1992). “The first is K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 21-4606a, which relates to probation.”
State v. Sylva, 804 P.2d 967 (Kan. 1991). “The lowest sentences which could be imposed are one year to five years on each count. See K.S.A. 21-4501(d).”
State v. Martin, 17 P.3d 344 (Kan. 2001). “See K.S.A. 21-4501(d). The trial court denied the motion to modify Sylva’s sentences.”
State v. Knabe, 757 P.2d 308 (Kan. 1988). “The State questions the court’s granting the defendant probation pursuant to K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-4606a. The facts in the case are not disputed.”
State v. Barraza-Flores, 819 P.2d 128 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “Judge Nyswonger asked counsel if they felt K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 21-4606a, the presumptive probation statute, applied in this case.”
State v. Fierro, 895 P.2d 186 (Kan. 1995). “With respect to Fierro's pre-guidelines sentence, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4606a addresses presumptive probation for crimes committed before July 1, 1993.”
State v. Brown, 823 P.2d 190 (Kan. 1991). “The Court of Appeals in Linsin stated that “in order to overcome the statutory presumption of probation in K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-4606a, the sentencing court may not merely rely upon the nature of the crime committed, but must follow the sentencing objectives of K.”
State v. Gonzales, 874 P.2d 612 (Kan. 1994). “In VanReed , this court found a narrow exception to the rule that “there is no direct appeal from a denial of probation following a guilty or nolo contendere plea” and stated that “[b]y the adoption of K.S.A. 21-4606a [presumptive sentence of probation for certain offenders],…”
State v. Atwell, 798 P.2d 517 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 21-4606a and K.S.A. 1989 Supp.”
State v. Sylva, 795 P.2d 947 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 21-4606a also became effective on July 1, 1989.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.