Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 22-3428a (2026)

Same; annual hearing on continued commitment; procedure, notice and standards; victim notification

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

22-3428a. Same; annual hearing on continued commitment; procedure, notice and standards; victim notification. (a) Any person found not guilty, pursuant to K.S.A. 21-5209 and 22-3221, and amendments thereto, who remains in the state security hospital or a state hospital for over one year pursuant to a commitment under K.S.A. 22-3428, and amendments thereto, shall be entitled annually to request a hearing to determine whether or not the person continues to be a mentally ill person. The request shall be made in writing to the district court of the county where the person is hospitalized and shall be signed by the committed person or the person's counsel. When the request is filed, the court shall give notice of the request to: (1) The county or district attorney of the county in which the person was originally ordered committed; and (2) the chief medical officer of the state security hospital or state hospital where the person is committed. The chief medical officer receiving the notice, or the officer's designee, shall conduct a mental examination of the person and shall send to the district court of the county where the person is hospitalized and to the county or district attorney of the county in which the person was originally ordered committed a report of the examination within 21 days from the date when notice from the court was received. Within 14 days after receiving the report of the examination, the county or district attorney receiving it may file a motion with the district court that gave the notice, requesting the court to change the venue of the hearing to the district court of the county in which the person was originally committed, or the court that gave the notice on its own motion may change the venue of the hearing to the district court of the county in which the person was originally committed. Upon receipt of that motion and the report of the mental examination or upon the court's own motion, the court shall transfer the hearing to the district court specified in the motion and send a copy of the court's records of the proceedings to that court.

(b) After the time in which a change of venue may be requested has elapsed, the court having venue shall set a date for the hearing, giving notice thereof to the county or district attorney of the county, the committed person and the person's counsel. The county or district attorney shall provide victim notification. If there is no counsel of record, the court shall appoint a counsel for the committed person. The committed person shall have the right to procure, at the person's own expense, a mental examination by a physician or licensed psychologist of the person's own choosing. If a committed person is financially unable to procure such an examination, the aid to indigent defendants provisions of article 45 of chapter 22 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, and amendments thereto, shall be applicable to that person. A committed person requesting a mental examination pursuant to K.S.A. 22-4508, and amendments thereto, may request a physician or licensed psychologist of the person's own choosing and the court shall request the physician or licensed psychologist to provide an estimate of the cost of the examination. If the physician or licensed psychologist agrees to accept compensation in an amount in accordance with the compensation standards set by the board of supervisors of panels to aid indigent defendants, the judge shall appoint the requested physician or licensed psychologist; otherwise, the court shall designate a physician or licensed psychologist to conduct the examination. Copies of each mental examination of the committed person shall be filed with the court at least seven days prior to the hearing and shall be supplied to the county or district attorney receiving notice pursuant to this section and the committed person's counsel.

(c) At the hearing the committed person shall have the right to present evidence and cross-examine the witnesses. The court shall receive all relevant evidence, including the written findings and recommendations of the chief medical officer of the state security hospital or state hospital where the person is under commitment, and shall determine whether the committed person continues to be a mentally ill person. At the hearing the court may make any order that a court is empowered to make pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3428(c), (d) and (e), and amendments thereto. If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence the committed person is not a mentally ill person, the court shall order the person discharged; otherwise, the person shall remain committed or be conditionally released. The county or district attorney shall provide victim notification regarding the outcome of the hearing.

(d) Costs of a hearing held pursuant to this section shall be assessed against and paid by the county in which the person was originally ordered committed.

History: L. 1978, ch. 127, § 1; L. 1979, ch. 97, § 2; L. 1980, ch. 105, § 2; L. 1982, ch. 148, § 3; L. 1986, ch. 211, § 29; L. 1986, ch. 299, § 3; L. 1986, ch. 134, § 1; L. 1989, ch. 101, § 2; L. 1993, ch. 247, § 3; L. 1995, ch. 251, § 29; L. 2010, ch. 61, § 5; L. 2011, ch. 91, § 18; L. 2014, ch. 5, § 4; L. 2023, ch. 93, § 6; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1979–2020 · leading case: In Re Application of Noel for Discharge Hearing, 838 P.2d 336 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).
In Re Application of Noel for Discharge Hearing, 838 P.2d 336 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 55× “Before RULON, P.J., REES and PIERRON, JJ. RULON, J.: Carroll E.”
In Re Jones, 612 P.2d 1211 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 6× “In such proceedings the court has the obligation to weigh all the evidence, including medical opinions, and reach an independent judgment.”
State v. Van Hoet, 89 P.3d 606 (Kan. 2004). · cites it 2× “See K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 22-3428a. However, the statute did provide for another means of discharge in a case where the chief medical officer of the state security hospital felt that such a discharge was warranted and the defendant could prove to the court that he or she was not a…”
State v. Becker, 958 P.2d 627 (Kan. 1998). · cites it 4× “See K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 22-3428a. The defendant could also be discharged after a hearing if the chief medical officer felt that such a discharge was warranted and the defendant could prove to the court that he or she was not a danger to self or others.”
Locklear v. Hultine, 528 F. Supp. 982 (D. Kan. 1981). · cites it 7× “) and K.S.A. 22-3428a (1980 Supp.) are unconstitutional and violative of the due process and equal protection provisions of the constitution.”
In Re Noel, 601 P.2d 1152 (Kan. 1979). · cites it 10× “In February, 1979, Noel filed an application pursuant to K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 22-3428a for hearing to determine whether or not he continued to be dangerous to himself or others.”
State v. Tims, 355 P.3d 660 (Kan. 2015). “22-3104(1) (counsel for inquisition witness); K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 22-3428a(2) (annual hearing for committed mentally ill person); K.”
In re I.A., 450 P.3d 347 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). “38-2356(c) (upon finding by court that juvenile committed offense charged but is not responsible because of mental disease or defect, juvenile shall be committed to state hospital and subject to annual review and potential discharge as provided by K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22-3428a).…”
State v. Tims, 317 P.3d 115 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “22-3104(1) (counsel for inquisition witness); K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 22-3428a(2) (annual hearing for committed mentally ill person); K.”
In re J.S. (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “38-2356(c) (upon finding by court that juvenile committed offense charged but is not responsible because of mental disease or defect, juvenile shall be committed to state hospital and subject to annual review and potential discharge as provided by K.”
— K.S.A. § 22-3428a(1) — 2 cases
In Re Jones, 612 P.2d 1211 (Kan. 1980). “In such proceedings the court has the obligation to weigh all the evidence, including medical opinions, and reach an independent judgment.”
In Re Application of Noel for Discharge Hearing, 838 P.2d 336 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “Before RULON, P.J., REES and PIERRON, JJ. RULON, J.: Carroll E.”
— K.S.A. § 22-3428a(2) — 2 cases
State v. Tims, 355 P.3d 660 (Kan. 2015). “22-3104(1) (counsel for inquisition witness); K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 22-3428a(2) (annual hearing for committed mentally ill person); K.”
State v. Tims, 317 P.3d 115 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “22-3104(1) (counsel for inquisition witness); K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 22-3428a(2) (annual hearing for committed mentally ill person); K.”
— K.S.A. § 22-3428a(3) — 3 cases
In Re Application of Noel for Discharge Hearing, 838 P.2d 336 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “Before RULON, P.J., REES and PIERRON, JJ. RULON, J.: Carroll E.”
State v. Van Hoet, 89 P.3d 606 (Kan. 2004). “See K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 22-3428a. However, the statute did provide for another means of discharge in a case where the chief medical officer of the state security hospital felt that such a discharge was warranted and the defendant could prove to the court that he or she was not a…”
Locklear v. Hultine, 528 F. Supp. 982 (D. Kan. 1981). “) and K.S.A. 22-3428a (1980 Supp.) are unconstitutional and violative of the due process and equal protection provisions of the constitution.”
— K.S.A. § 22-3428a(l) — 3 cases
In Re Jones, 612 P.2d 1211 (Kan. 1980). “In such proceedings the court has the obligation to weigh all the evidence, including medical opinions, and reach an independent judgment.”
In Re Application of Noel for Discharge Hearing, 838 P.2d 336 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “Before RULON, P.J., REES and PIERRON, JJ. RULON, J.: Carroll E.”
Locklear v. Hultine, 528 F. Supp. 982 (D. Kan. 1981). “) and K.S.A. 22-3428a (1980 Supp.) are unconstitutional and violative of the due process and equal protection provisions of the constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.