Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 25-4102 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

25-4102.

History: L. 1974, ch. 166, § 2; L. 1975, ch. 209, § 1; Repealed, L. 1981, ch. 171, § 51; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Applied in construing K.S.A. 46-143; "candidate" and "member elect" distinguished. Rogers v. Shanahan, 221 Kan. 221, 224, 565 P.2d 1384.

2. Subsection (d) and (f) held not unconstitutionally vague. Parcell v. State of Kansas, 468 F. Supp. 1274, 1275, 1280.

3. Definitions of "contribution" and "expenditures" held not unconstitutionally vague. Parcell v. Governmental Ethics Com'n, 639 F.2d 628, 629.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1980 · leading case: Parcell v. State of Kan., 468 F. Supp. 1274 (D. Kan. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Parcell v. State of Kan., 468 F. Supp. 1274 (D. Kan. 1979). “K.S.A. 25-4102(d) and (f). Ostensibly both definitions cover the activity of Parcell in the preparation and distribution of the political flyers.”
Doris E. Parcell v. Governmental Ethics Comm'n, 639 F.2d 628 (10th Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “8 K.S.A.1975 Supp. 25-4102(d). The term "expenditure" is also defined: 9 (f)(1) "Expenditure" means: (1) Any purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or any other thing of value made for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election of any…”
K.S.A. § 25-4102(d): 2 cases
Parcell v. State of Kan., 468 F. Supp. 1274 (D. Kan. 1979). “K.S.A. 25-4102(d) and (f). Ostensibly both definitions cover the activity of Parcell in the preparation and distribution of the political flyers.”
Doris E. Parcell v. Governmental Ethics Comm'n, 639 F.2d 628 (10th Cir. 1980). “8 K.S.A.1975 Supp. 25-4102(d). The term "expenditure" is also defined: 9 (f)(1) "Expenditure" means: (1) Any purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or any other thing of value made for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election of any…”
K.S.A. § 25-4102(f): 1 case
Doris E. Parcell v. Governmental Ethics Comm'n, 639 F.2d 628 (10th Cir. 1980). “8 K.S.A.1975 Supp. 25-4102(d). The term "expenditure" is also defined: 9 (f)(1) "Expenditure" means: (1) Any purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or any other thing of value made for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election of any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.