History:
L. 1974, ch. 166, § 10; L. 1975, ch. 209, § 8; Repealed, L. 1981, ch. 171, § 51; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited in construing K.S.A. 22-3415 as conferring power on attorney general and district and county attorneys to grant immunity for testimony before an administrative agency. Governmental Ethics Commission v. Cahill, 225 Kan. 772, 773, 594 P.2d 1103.
2. Mentioned in suit challenging constitutionality of act. Parcell v. State of Kansas, 468 F. Supp. 1274, 1280.
Parcell v. State of Kan., 468 F. Supp. 1274 (D. Kan. 1979). · cites it 2דThe complaint to the Commission alleges: *1276 “Doris Parcell violated K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 25-4110 by making contributions or expenditures for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election to state office of Bill D.”
Doris E. Parcell v. Governmental Ethics Comm'n, State of Kansas, & Leonard Thomas, 626 F.2d 160 (10th Cir. 1980). · cites it 2דThe complaint stated: Doris Parcell violated K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 25-4110 by making contributions or expenditures for the purpose of influencing the nomination or election to State office of Bill D.”
Governmental Ethics Comm'n v. Cahill, 594 P.2d 1103 (Kan. 1979). “This commission was created by K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 25-4119a with the duty and the authority to enforce compliance with the provisions of the Campaign Finance Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.