25-4160.
Complaints of violations; copy to respondent.
Any individual, including any member of the commission, may file, by mail or in person, with the commission a verified complaint in writing stating the name of any person to whom or to which the campaign finance act applies who is alleged to have violated any provision of the campaign finance act, and which shall set forth the particulars thereof. If a member of the commission files a complaint, such member shall be disqualified from the commission's consideration of that complaint. Whenever a complaint is filed with the commission, the commission shall promptly send a copy thereof to the person complained of, who shall thereafter be designated as the respondent.
History:
L. 1981, ch. 171, § 19; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Nichols v. Kansas Political Action Comm., 11 P.3d 1134 (Kan. 2000).
· cites it 3× “K.S.A. 25-4160; K.S.A. 25- 4161. “The legislature saw fit to limit the relief from a violation of the campaign pledge to a complaint before the Commission.”
Cole v. Mayans, 80 P.3d 384 (Kan. 2003).
“See K.S.A. 25-4160; K.S.A. 25-4183. Cole, on the other hand, argues that Mayans should not be allowed to raise a new defense on appeal.”
Nichols v. Kansas Governmental Ethics Comm'n, 18 P.3d 270 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “25-4160 provides that any person may file “with the commission a verified complaint in writing stating the name of any person to whom or to which the campaign finance act applies who is alleged to have violated any provision of the campaign finance act, and which shall set forth…”
Gietzen v. Feleciano, Jr., 964 P.2d 699 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
“K.S.A. 25-4160; K.S.A. 25-4161. The legislature saw fit to limit the relief from a violation of the campaign pledge to a complaint before the Commission.”
Fresh Vision OP, Inc. v. Skoglund, No. 5:24-cv-04055 (D. Kan. Jan. 3, 2025).
· cites it 2× “Kan. Stat. Ann. § 25-4160 . And when a third party does file a complaint, that party can either turn it over to the KGEC’s Executive Director to prosecute or can follow it through independently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.