Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 25-4301 (2026)
Officers subject to recall; exceptions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
25-4301. Officers subject to recall; exceptions. All elected public officials in the state, except judicial officers, are subject to recall by the voters of the state or the political subdivision from which elected.
History: L. 1976, ch. 178, § 1; April 14.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2022 · leading case: Unger v. Horn, 732 P.2d 1275 (Kan. 1987).
Unger v. Horn, 732 P.2d 1275 (Kan. 1987). “K.S.A. 25-4301. The statutory grounds for recall are conviction of a felony, misconduct in office, incompetence, or failure to perform duties prescribed by law.”
Cline v. Tittel, 891 P.2d 1137 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “The Kansas Recall of Elected Officials Act, K.S.A. 25-4301 et seq., governs the procedure required for voters to exercise their right to recall public officials.”
Cline v. Meis, 905 P.2d 1072 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “” “The Kansas Recall of Elected Officials Act, K.S.A. 25-4301 et seq., governs the procedure required for voters to exercise their right to recall public officials.”
Baker v. Gibson, 913 P.2d 1218 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “The right to recall public officials is guaranteed by Article 4, Section 3 of the Kansas Constitution, which states: “All elected public officials in the state, except judicial officers, shall be subject *38 to recall by voters of the state or political subdivision from which…”
Collins v. Hoeme, 189 P.3d 566 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “The Committee sought to dismiss the recall petition, claiming that the Kansas Recall of Elected Officials Act (Recall Act), K.S.A. 25-4301 et seq., makes no provision for monetary damages, and Collins’ only recourse would be to request the denial of the recall petition.”
Pretty Prairie Wind v. Reno Cnty. (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “See K.S.A. 25-4301 et seq. (governing recall of elected officials); K.”
Reynolds v. Figge, 19 P.3d 193 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “) See K.S.A. 25-4301. The method of organization of a recall committee is set forth in K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.