Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 25-4325 (2026)

Recall of local officers; petition; affidavit, form, number of signatures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

25-4325. Recall of local officers; petition; affidavit, form, number of signatures. Before being filed, each petition shall be certified by an affidavit by the sponsor who personally circulated the petition. The affidavit shall state in substance that (a) the person signing the affidavit is a sponsor, (b) the person is the only circulator of that petition or copy, (c) the signatures were made in such person's actual presence, (d) to the best of such person's knowledge, the signatures are those of the persons whose names they purport to be, (e) the person circulated the petition in the manner provided by this act and (f) the person signing the affidavit, being duly sworn, on oath states that the statements of grounds for recall contained in the recall petition are true. In determining the sufficiency of the petition, the county election officer shall not count signatures on petitions not properly certified. The recall committee may file the petition only if signed by registered electors in the election district of the local officer sought to be recalled equal in number to not less than 40% of the votes cast for all candidates for the office of the local officer sought to be recalled, such percentage to be based upon the last general election for the current term of office of the local officer sought to be recalled. If more than one person was elected to such office at such election the number of signatures required shall be equal to not less than 40% of the votes cast at such election for all candidates for the office divided by the number of persons elected to such office.

History: L. 1976, ch. 178, § 25; L. 1976, ch. 177, § 5; L. 1978, ch. 147, § 8; L. 1987, ch. 130, § 2; L. 2003, ch. 127, § 8; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1987–2016 · leading case: Eveleigh v. Conness, 933 P.2d 675 (Kan. 1997).
Eveleigh v. Conness, 933 P.2d 675 (Kan. 1997). · cites it 20× “K.S.A. 25-4325 requires that “each petition [before being filed] shall be certified by an affidavit by the sponsor who personally circulated the petition.”
State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of Wichita, 367 P.3d 282 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 2× “2d 675 (1997), this court applied the doctrine of liberal construction to interpret an ambiguity in the recall petition statute, K.S.A. 25-4325 (Furse 1993), and concluded there was substantial compliance with its provisions.”
Richards v. Schmidt, 56 P.3d 274 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 11× “K.S.A. 25-4325 states that the number of signatures required for a valid recall petition is 40% of the votes cast in the “last general election.”
Unger v. Horn, 732 P.2d 1275 (Kan. 1987). · cites it 4× “" K.S.A. 25-4325 provides: "Before being filed, each petition shall be certified by an affidavit by the sponsor who personally circulated the petition.”
Baker v. Gibson, 913 P.2d 1218 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “K.S.A. 25-4325. Within 30 days of the date of this second filing, the county election officer shall review the petition and shall notify the recall committee and the local officer sought to be recalled whether the petition was properly or improperly filed.”
Dusin v. Riggs, 924 P.2d 660 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Riggs rejected certain petitions as insufficient because a number of the petitions had attached an affidavit attesting, among other things, that “[t]he statements of grounds for recall contained in the recall petition are true to the best of my knowledge and ability.”
— K.S.A. § 25-4325(f) — 1 case
Eveleigh v. Conness, 933 P.2d 675 (Kan. 1997). “K.S.A. 25-4325 requires that “each petition [before being filed] shall be certified by an affidavit by the sponsor who personally circulated the petition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.