K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1582 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1582.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 53; L. 1994, ch. 301, § 6; L. 1998, ch. 139, § 7; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1987–2007 · leading case: In the Interest of S.R., 116 P.3d 43 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In the Interest of S.R., 116 P.3d 43 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “If termination of parental rights proceedings are resumed, compliance with K.S.A. 38-1582 will be required. In light of the above determination, it is unnecessary to address D.”
In the Interest of J.D.D., 908 P.2d 633 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “Even more to the point is K.S.A. 38-1582. This statute, which sets forth procedures to be used upon a request for termination of parental rights, contains an explicit reference to interested parties: “Prior to the commencement of the hearing the court shall deter *873 mine that…”
In the Interest of H.C., 939 P.2d 937 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 38-1582 governs the proper procedure to be followed in termination cases.”
In the Interest of L.S., 788 P.2d 875 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 38-1582(b) requires the trial court to determine due diligence was used in locating interested parties.”
In re S.M., 738 P.2d 883 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “) If a parent appears at the hearing in which his or her parental *257 rights may be severed, the court may not exclude that person from the courtroom. Even if a person fails to appear at such a hearing after proper notice is given, the court must appoint an attorney to…”
In Re Sr, 34 Kan. App. 2d 202 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “If termination of parental rights proceedings are resumed, compliance with K.S.A. 38-1582 will be required. In light of the above determination, it is unnecessary to address D.”
In the Interest of M. K., 59 P.3d 355 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “The same parties must be notified by the court for parental termination proceedings under K.S.A. 38-1582(b)(1). As we construe these statutes, for pretermination hearings, termination proceedings, and post-termination permanency hearings, the R’s were statutorily entitled to…”
In the Interest of C.B., 117 P.3d 888 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “38-1533(a); K.S.A. 38-1582. It is apparent that the legislature used the word and in K.”
Brown v. Warden, Warden, USP-Florence, 224 F. App'x 732 (10th Cir. 2007). “…any evidence that he utilized the numerous procedural safeguards afforded by Kansas law to achieve his goals. See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-1582 (d) (appointment of an attorney for any parent who fails to appear), § 38-1553 (stipulations), § 38-1559 (notice), § 38-1584…”
In Re the Adoption of A.P., 982 P.2d 985 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “38-1583 factors, the court must follow the proper procedures in K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1582(a) and (b), namely, the court must give proper notice of the hearing and notice to grandparents within 10 business days before the hearing.”
In Re Hc, 939 P.2d 937 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 38-1582 governs the proper procedure to be followed in termination cases.”
In Re Ls, 788 P.2d 875 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 38-1582(b) requires the trial court to determine due diligence was used in locating interested parties.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 38-1582(a) — 1 case
In Re the Adoption of A.P., 982 P.2d 985 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “38-1583 factors, the court must follow the proper procedures in K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1582(a) and (b), namely, the court must give proper notice of the hearing and notice to grandparents within 10 business days before the hearing.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1582(b) — 2 cases
In the Interest of L.S., 788 P.2d 875 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “K.S.A. 38-1582(b) requires the trial court to determine due diligence was used in locating interested parties.”
In Re Ls, 788 P.2d 875 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “K.S.A. 38-1582(b) requires the trial court to determine due diligence was used in locating interested parties.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1582(b)(1) — 2 cases
In the Interest of M. K., 59 P.3d 355 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “The same parties must be notified by the court for parental termination proceedings under K.S.A. 38-1582(b)(1). As we construe these statutes, for pretermination hearings, termination proceedings, and post-termination permanency hearings, the R’s were statutorily entitled to…”
In Re Mk, 59 P.3d 355 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 38-1582(b)(1)(A) — 1 case
In Re Bkj, 9 P.3d 586 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
— K.S.A. § 38-1582(b)(3) — 4 cases
In the Interest of S.R., 116 P.3d 43 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “If termination of parental rights proceedings are resumed, compliance with K.S.A. 38-1582 will be required. In light of the above determination, it is unnecessary to address D.”
In the Interest of H.C., 939 P.2d 937 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 38-1582 governs the proper procedure to be followed in termination cases.”
In Re Sr, 34 Kan. App. 2d 202 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “If termination of parental rights proceedings are resumed, compliance with K.S.A. 38-1582 will be required. In light of the above determination, it is unnecessary to address D.”
In Re Hc, 939 P.2d 937 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 38-1582 governs the proper procedure to be followed in termination cases.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1582(c) — 6 cases
In the Interest of S.R., 116 P.3d 43 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “If termination of parental rights proceedings are resumed, compliance with K.S.A. 38-1582 will be required. In light of the above determination, it is unnecessary to address D.”
In the Interest of L.S., 788 P.2d 875 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “K.S.A. 38-1582(b) requires the trial court to determine due diligence was used in locating interested parties.”
In Re Sr, 34 Kan. App. 2d 202 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “If termination of parental rights proceedings are resumed, compliance with K.S.A. 38-1582 will be required. In light of the above determination, it is unnecessary to address D.”
In the Interest of H.C., 939 P.2d 937 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 38-1582 governs the proper procedure to be followed in termination cases.”
In Re Hc, 939 P.2d 937 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 38-1582 governs the proper procedure to be followed in termination cases.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1582(d) — 2 cases
In re S.M., 738 P.2d 883 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987). “) If a parent appears at the hearing in which his or her parental *257 rights may be severed, the court may not exclude that person from the courtroom. Even if a person fails to appear at such a hearing after proper notice is given, the court must appoint an attorney to…”
In Re Sm, 738 P.2d 883 (Kan. Ct. App. 1987).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.