K.S.A. » Chapter 59
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 59-2907 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-2907.

History: L. 1965, ch. 348, § 7; L. 1970, ch. 230, § 3; L. 1976, ch. 243, § 7; Repealed, L. 1976, ch. 248, § 99; Revived, L. 1976, ch. 246, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 223, § 3; L. 1986, ch. 211, § 4; L. 1990, ch. 92, § 19; Repealed, L. 1996, ch. 167, § 65; April 18.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. No duty imposed on VA hospital to apply for determination of mental illness regarding cooperative psychiatric patient in determining federal tort claims act liability. Mahomes-Vinson v. U.S., 751 F. Supp. 913, 918 (1990).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1990–2009 · leading case: Boulanger v. Pol, 900 P.2d 823 (Kan. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Boulanger v. Pol, 900 P.2d 823 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 9× “[K.S.A. 59-2907.] .... Section 59-2907, however, does not impose any duty upon the hospital to seek commitment.”
Mahomes-Vinson v. United States, 751 F. Supp. 913 (D. Kan. 1990). · cites it 7× “Plaintiff contends nonetheless that she has a viable cause of action because the court in Hokansen was confronted with a different version of K.S.A. 59-2907 than was in effect at the time of Prewett’s release.”
Adams v. Bd. of Sedgwick Cnty. Commissioners, 214 P.3d 1173 (Kan. 2009). “” K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 59-2907 (repealed L. 1996, ch.”
Adams v. Bd. of Sedgwick Cnty. Com'rs, 214 P.3d 1173 (Kan. 2009). “" K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 59-2907 (repealed L.1996, ch.”
— K.S.A. § 59-2907(a) — 1 case
Boulanger v. Pol, 900 P.2d 823 (Kan. 1995). “[K.S.A. 59-2907.] .... Section 59-2907, however, does not impose any duty upon the hospital to seek commitment.”
— K.S.A. § 59-2907(b) — 1 case
Boulanger v. Pol, 900 P.2d 823 (Kan. 1995). “[K.S.A. 59-2907.] .... Section 59-2907, however, does not impose any duty upon the hospital to seek commitment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.