Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 65-4135 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
65-4135.
History: L. 1972, ch. 234, § 35; L. 1984, ch. 237, § 3; L. 1986, ch. 243, § 2; L. 1987, ch. 114, § 2; L. 1988, ch. 258, § 1; L. 1990, ch. 232, § 1; L. 1993, ch. 141, § 1; Repealed, L. 1994, ch. 339, § 28; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1983–2008 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Love v. One 1967 Chevrolet El Camino Bearing Vin 136807Z141367, 799 P.2d 1043 (Kan. 1990).
State Ex Rel. Love v. One 1967 Chevrolet El Camino Bearing Vin 136807Z141367, 799 P.2d 1043 (Kan. 1990). “: This in rem proceeding is our first consideration of the property forfeiture provisions of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 65-4135 and K.S.A. 1989 Supp.”
State v. Brickhouse, 890 P.2d 353 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “The police seized defendant’s automobile for forfeiture purposes pursuant to K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 65-4135. This seizure was accomplished without a warrant and in the absence of any claimed exigent circumstances.”
State Ex Rel. Braun v. a Tract of Land, 840 P.2d 453 (Kan. 1992). “: This is a civil action involving the forfeiture of real property pursuant to K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(7)(A), a provision of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.”
State v. One 1978 Chevrolet Corvette Vin 1Z87L8S437138, 667 P.2d 893 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “: This is an in rem proceeding under K.S.A. 65-4135 to forfeit a 1978 Chevrolet Corvette which had been used to transport marijuana for sale.”
Kansas High. Patrol ex rel. Settle v. 1985 Chevrolet Astro Van VinIGCDM15NOFB177466, 954 P.2d 718 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 65-4135, K.S.A. 65-4136, K.”
State v. 1978 Chevrolet Auto., 835 P.2d 1376 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “: This is a civil action brought by the State of Kansas to forfeit $31,550 in cash under K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(6). After trial, the trial court ordered the cash forfeited.”
In the Interest of J.L., 891 P.2d 1125 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “2d 1376 (1992): “K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(6) states that the presumption raised in that statute is governed by K.”
In Re Tax Exemption Application of City of Wichita, 877 P.2d 437 (Kan. 1994). “The City acquired a one-story single family dwelling with garage by forfeiture for violations of Kansas drug laws pursuant to K.S.A. 65-4135. The City owned the property from May 27, 1988, to September 13, 1989, for which period it requested an exemption from ad valorem taxation.”
State Ex Rel. Braun v. a Tract of Land in the Nw. Quarter of Section Four, Twp. Eleven South, Range Nineteen West of the 6th P.M.A Tract of Land in the Nw. Quarter of Section Four, Twp. Eleven South, Range Nineteen West of the 6th P.M., 829 P.2d 600 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “: Clarence Gilbert challenges the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(7)(A) of the forfeiture statute.”
Ulmer v. City of Overland Park, Kan., 784 F. Supp. 807 (D. Kan. 1992). “See K.S.A. 65-4135. That afternoon, plaintiff’s son transported defendant Tippie to his parents’ home.”
State v. One 1984 Chevrolet Corvette, 818 P.2d 800 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “The applicable forfeiture statute, K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 65-4135, reads in part: “(a) The following are subject to forfeiture: “(4) all conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels, which are used or intended for use to transport or in any manner to facilitate the…”
City of Lenexa v. A Maroon 1978 Chevrolet Caprice Classic, 807 P.2d 694 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “Harold’s reaction to the service of these documents was to completely ignore the discovery process. He did not respond to the requests for discovery either by answering or objecting to the written requests and demands.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(a)(4) — 4 cases
State Ex Rel. Love v. One 1967 Chevrolet El Camino Bearing Vin 136807Z141367, 799 P.2d 1043 (Kan. 1990). “: This in rem proceeding is our first consideration of the property forfeiture provisions of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 65-4135 and K.S.A. 1989 Supp.”
State v. Brickhouse, 890 P.2d 353 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “The police seized defendant’s automobile for forfeiture purposes pursuant to K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 65-4135. This seizure was accomplished without a warrant and in the absence of any claimed exigent circumstances.”
State v. One 1984 Chevrolet Corvette, 818 P.2d 800 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “The applicable forfeiture statute, K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 65-4135, reads in part: “(a) The following are subject to forfeiture: “(4) all conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels, which are used or intended for use to transport or in any manner to facilitate the…”
Ulmer v. City of Overland Park, Kan., 784 F. Supp. 807 (D. Kan. 1992). “See K.S.A. 65-4135. That afternoon, plaintiff’s son transported defendant Tippie to his parents’ home.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(a)(4)(B) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Love v. One 1967 Chevrolet El Camino Bearing Vin 136807Z141367, 799 P.2d 1043 (Kan. 1990). “: This in rem proceeding is our first consideration of the property forfeiture provisions of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 65-4135 and K.S.A. 1989 Supp.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(a)(4)(D) — 1 case
State v. One 1978 Chevrolet Corvette Vin 1Z87L8S437138, 667 P.2d 893 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “: This is an in rem proceeding under K.S.A. 65-4135 to forfeit a 1978 Chevrolet Corvette which had been used to transport marijuana for sale.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(a)(6) — 5 cases
State v. 1978 Chevrolet Auto., 835 P.2d 1376 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “: This is a civil action brought by the State of Kansas to forfeit $31,550 in cash under K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(6). After trial, the trial court ordered the cash forfeited.”
In the Interest of J.L., 891 P.2d 1125 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “2d 1376 (1992): “K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(6) states that the presumption raised in that statute is governed by K.”
Kansas High. Patrol ex rel. Settle v. 1985 Chevrolet Astro Van VinIGCDM15NOFB177466, 954 P.2d 718 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “, K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 65-4135, K.S.A. 65-4136, K.”
State v. Fitzgerald, 192 P.3d 171 (Kan. 2008).
In Re Jl, 20 Kan. App. 2d 665 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(a)(7)(A) — 4 cases
State Ex Rel. Braun v. a Tract of Land, 840 P.2d 453 (Kan. 1992). “: This is a civil action involving the forfeiture of real property pursuant to K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(7)(A), a provision of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.”
State Ex Rel. Braun v. a Tract of Land in the Nw. Quarter of Section Four, Twp. Eleven South, Range Nineteen West of the 6th P.M.A Tract of Land in the Nw. Quarter of Section Four, Twp. Eleven South, Range Nineteen West of the 6th P.M., 829 P.2d 600 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “: Clarence Gilbert challenges the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 65-4135(a)(7)(A) of the forfeiture statute.”
United States v. Walters, 89 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (D. Kan. 2000).
City of Garden City v. Lot Nine, Block Three, 819 P.2d 1250 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991).
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(b) — 1 case
State v. Brickhouse, 890 P.2d 353 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “The police seized defendant’s automobile for forfeiture purposes pursuant to K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 65-4135. This seizure was accomplished without a warrant and in the absence of any claimed exigent circumstances.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(b)(3) — 2 cases
State v. Brickhouse, 890 P.2d 353 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “The police seized defendant’s automobile for forfeiture purposes pursuant to K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 65-4135. This seizure was accomplished without a warrant and in the absence of any claimed exigent circumstances.”
Ulmer v. City of Overland Park, Kan., 784 F. Supp. 807 (D. Kan. 1992). “See K.S.A. 65-4135. That afternoon, plaintiff’s son transported defendant Tippie to his parents’ home.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4135(c) — 1 case
Ulmer v. City of Overland Park, Kan., 784 F. Supp. 807 (D. Kan. 1992). “See K.S.A. 65-4135. That afternoon, plaintiff’s son transported defendant Tippie to his parents’ home.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.