1. Defective cruise control no defense to violation of speeding statute (K.S.A. 8-1336); absolute liability. State v. Baker, 1 Kan. App. 2d 568, 573, 571 P.2d 65.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1977–2013 · leading case: State v. Baker, 571 P.2d 65 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977).
State v. Baker, 571 P.2d 65 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2דThe result was that the defendant was found guilty of driving in excess of the posted speed limit, and, also, that defendant was the “driver” of the car as defined by K.S.A. 8-1416. The sentence of $10 and costs was suspended pending this appeal.”
State v. Sanchez, 296 P.3d 1133 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 3ד) K.S.A. 8-1416. Because K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 8-1567 is part of the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic, this definition is controlling in this case.”
State v. Thomas, 20 P.3d 82 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “However, there was no evidence presented to the juiy that Thomas was merely attempting to drive the vehicle. Instead, the evidence showed that Thomas was in actual physical control of the vehicle in that he maneuvered it approximately a third of a mile by steering it and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.