Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 100
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.031 (2026)

Repealed, 1966

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Agreement between city of first class, and county containing such city, for planning and zoning. History: Repealed 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 172, sec. 91. -- Created 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 176, sec. 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1951–1970 · leading case: City of Louisville v. Bryan S. McCoy, Inc., 286 S.W.2d 546 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Louisville v. Bryan S. McCoy, Inc., 286 S.W.2d 546 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). · cites it 3× “We think it is appropriate to call attention, at this point, to the fact that a different test of validity of the action of the zoning authorities applies in cases arising under KRS 100.031 to 100.098, where the statutes provide for a trial de novo in the circuit court.”
City of Louisville v. Thompson, 339 S.W.2d 869 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “Suffice it to say that there is no conflict with the zoning statutes, KRS 100.031, or with KRS 318.130 and the plumbing code promulgated thereunder.”
Taylor v. Coblin, 461 S.W.2d 78 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “As an extension of the exercise of the police power, the interference or regulation by public authority of the use of a citizen’s *81 property must be for the superior interest and rights of the public, and the power must be exercised in a reasonable and fair manner for the…”
Bischoff v. Hennessy, 251 S.W.2d 582 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “086(2), expressly stipulates that nothing in the sections of the Zoning and Planning Statutes governing cities of the first class and counties containing such cities, KRS 100.031 to 100.097, shall be construed in a way which would deprive an interested party of any right which…”
Durning v. Summerfield, 235 S.W.2d 761 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “KRS 100.031 and 100.096 provide for planning and zoning commissions for cities and counties.”
Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n v. Fortner, 243 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “Under the statutes relating to planning and zoning in Louisville and Jefferson County, KRS 100.031 to 100.098, the joint city-county planning and zoning commission has authority to recommend a zoning plan and restrictions for the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the…”
Hager v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 261 S.W.2d 619 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “In short, the ultimate effect of the resolution will be to incorporate appellants’ land into ponding areas as a part of the flood protection project of the city and county and this will constitute such a limitation upon the use of their property as to amount to a talcing for a…”
Franklin Cnty. v. Webster, 400 S.W.2d 693 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “086 that: “Nothing contained in KRS 100.031 to 100.097 shall be construed to deprive any person * * * of any right * * * to proceed by injunction, mandamus, or other appropriate proceeding either in equity or law.”
Louisville Builders Supply Co. of St. Matthews v. City of Richlawn, 392 S.W.2d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “033 provides that any incorporated municipality within a county containing a city of the first class may, under certain conditions, avail itself of the benefits of KRS 100.031 through 100.097 and shall thereafter be subject to their provisions.”
Hamilton Co. v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 287 S.W.2d 434 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “As an extension of the exercise of the police power, the interference or' regulation by public authority of the use of a citizen’s property must be for the superior interest and rights of the public, and the power must be exercised in a reasonable and fair manner for the…”
Hawkins v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 266 S.W.2d 314 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “The Louisville and Jefferson County Planning and Zoning Commission, which has jurisdiction over the unincorporated areas of Jefferson County, but which, because the City of Louisville has not elected to operate under the statute, KRS 100.031 to 100.098, does not have…”
Hofgesang v. McMakin, 457 S.W.2d 950 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “The statutes involved are KRS 100.031 through 100.097, repealed and replaced in 1966 by KRS 100.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.