Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 100
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.066 (2026)

Repealed, 1966

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Zoning plan; what to include; adoption; adjustment. History: Repealed 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 172, sec. 91. -- Created 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 176, sec. 8.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1948–1968 · leading case: Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n v. Fortner, 243 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n v. Fortner, 243 S.W.2d 492 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). · cites it 2× “This plan is not effective in the city until adopted by the board of aldermen, and is not effective in the county until adopted by the fiscal court, KRS 100.066, ' 100.048, 100.049. After the plan has been adopted, the board of aldermen and the fiscal court may delegate full…”
Fritts v. City of Ashland, 348 S.W.2d 712 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “See KRS 100.066, 100.520. If the appellees’ argument were carried to its logical conclusion the mere fact that employment would be provided through a particular use of land *714 would overcome all other factors, and a boiler factory could be put in the middle of a beautiful…”
Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n v. Ogden, 210 S.W.2d 771 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “The adjustment in the original master zoning plan is authorized by KRS 100.066, and the procedure is defined in KRS 100.”
Boyd v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 230 S.W.2d 444 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “Tjhe action was taken under KRS 100.066, 100.052 and 100.056. The respective statements of appeal set forth several reasons why the action should not have been taken and should not be confirmed by the court.”
City of Louisville v. Bryan S. McCoy, Inc., 286 S.W.2d 546 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “The statutes further provide for similar adoption of a “zoning plan,” KRS 100.066. A master plan for the county only was prepared and adopted by the fiscal court, and a zoning plan for the county only likewise was prepared and adopted by the fiscal court.”
Boron Oil Co. v. Cathedral Found., Inc., 434 S.W.2d 640 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “KRS 100.066 and KRS 100.540. See Hatch v.”
Am. Sign Corp. v. Fowler, 276 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “360(3), also relating to cities of the second class, the objects of zoning are stated so as to include lessening congestion in the streets, providing adequate light and air, preventing overcrowding of land, avoiding the undue concentration of population, and facilitating the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.