Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 216C
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.160 (2026)

Repealed, 2019

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Submission of evidence to medical review panel. (Declared void) History: Repealed 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 180, sec. 2, effective June 27, 2019. -- Created 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 22, sec. 17, effective June 29, 2017.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2022 · leading case: Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). · cites it 2× “” KRS 216C.160(2). They had the power to “issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum in aid of the taking of depositions and the production of documentary evidence for inspection or copying, or both.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “See KRS 216C.160(2) (providing for review of records and witness depositions and affidavits); KRS 216C.”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “” KRS 216C.160(2). They had the power to “issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum in aid of the taking of depositions and the production of documentary evidence for inspection or copying, or both.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.160(2) — 3 cases
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). “” KRS 216C.160(2). They had the power to “issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum in aid of the taking of depositions and the production of documentary evidence for inspection or copying, or both.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “See KRS 216C.160(2) (providing for review of records and witness depositions and affidavits); KRS 216C.”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “” KRS 216C.160(2). They had the power to “issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum in aid of the taking of depositions and the production of documentary evidence for inspection or copying, or both.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.160(4) — 3 cases
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). “” KRS 216C.160(2). They had the power to “issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum in aid of the taking of depositions and the production of documentary evidence for inspection or copying, or both.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “See KRS 216C.160(2) (providing for review of records and witness depositions and affidavits); KRS 216C.”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “” KRS 216C.160(2). They had the power to “issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum in aid of the taking of depositions and the production of documentary evidence for inspection or copying, or both.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.