Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 216C
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.170 (2026)

Repealed, 2019

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Restriction on ex parte communication with panel member -- Panel's right to all necessary and relevant information. (Declared void) History: Repealed 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 180, sec. 2, effective June 27, 2019. -- Created 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 22, sec. 18, effective June 29, 2017.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2022 · leading case: Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). “Further, KRS 216C.170(2) bestowed the following rights on medical review panels: (a) The panel has the right and duty to request all necessary and relevant information.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “160(4) (providing for the power to issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum); KRS 216C.170(2) (providing for the right to request information and conduct a hearing); and KRS 216C.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.170(2) — 2 cases
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). “Further, KRS 216C.170(2) bestowed the following rights on medical review panels: (a) The panel has the right and duty to request all necessary and relevant information.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “160(4) (providing for the power to issue administrative subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum); KRS 216C.170(2) (providing for the right to request information and conduct a hearing); and KRS 216C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.