Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes
La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
LA-LEGlegis.la.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§4. Jurisdiction, duties, and powers of the secretary; rules and regulations
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1957–2024 · leading case: Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co., 144 So. 3d 791 (La. 2013).
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co., 144 So. 3d 791 (La. 2013). “La.Rev.Stat. § 30:4, 9, 10. When such units are created, the operations of the designated operator constitute operations for all lessees participating in the unit, and the orders of the Commissioner creating said units supersede, supplement, replace and are incorporated in the…”
Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co., 488 So. 2d 955 (La. 1986). “[2] The Commissioner's authority to hold hearings is based on La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 30:4 B. The hearings are informal, and the Commissioner usually admits all evidence which appears to be relevant without regard to rules of evidence.”
Davis Oil Co. v. TS, INC., 962 F. Supp. 872 (E.D. La. 1997). “E & F) and section 30:4(0(1) of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, not later than February 5, 1993.”
Amoco Prod. Co. v. Thompson, 516 So. 2d 376 (La. Ct. App. 1987). “R.S. 30:4(A). The Commissioner has the authority to make any reasonable rule, regulation and/or order that is necessary to properly administer and enforce the Conservation Law.”
Magnolia Coal Terminal v. Phillips Oil, 576 So. 2d 475 (La. 1991). “The jurisdiction of the commissioner of conservation, outlined in LSA-R.S. 30:4, extends to the plugging of oil and gas wells.”
Hunt Oil Co. v. Batchelor, 644 So. 2d 191 (La. 1994). “R.S. 30:4 A. The Commissioner has the authority to make any reasonable rule, regulation and/or order that is necessary to properly administer and enforce the Conservation Law.”
Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson, 731 So. 2d 190 (La. 1999). “30:4(A), "[t]he commissioner has jurisdiction and authority over all persons and property necessary to enforce effectively the provisions of the Chapter and all other laws relating to the conservation of oil or gas." In furtherance of that jurisdiction, La.”
B A Kelly Land v. Aethon Energy, 25 F.4th 369 (5th Cir. 2022). “R.S. 30:4, 9, 10). The designated operator is then charged with drilling within the unit and paying a proportionate share of the proceeds of the production to the owners of mineral interests in the unit.”
Cockerham v. Atl. Richfield Co., 615 So. 2d 547 (La. Ct. App. 1993). “To support this argument, ARCO cites LSA-R.S. 30:4(C) which gives the Commissioner of Conservation authority to make reasonable rules and regulations regarding the plugging and abandonment of oil wells.”
Frank C. Minvielle, L.L.C. v. IMC Global Operations, Inc., 380 F. Supp. 2d 755 (W.D. La. 2004). “R.S. 30:4(C). The DEQ has jurisdiction over remedial action plans and has set forth a process by which remediation plans are approved and enforceable.”
Hunter v. Hussey, 90 So. 2d 429 (La. Ct. App. 1957). “B, he is authorized merely "to regulate " other secondary recovery methods including the introduction of water into producing formations, LSA-R.S. 30:4, subd. C(10). Legislative efforts to broaden the powers of the Commissioner in this regard have been unsuccessful.”
Mills v. Davis Oil Co., 11 F.3d 1298 (5th Cir. 1994). “R.S. 30:4 provides “that the commissioner has jurisdiction and authority over all persons and property.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(A) — 9 cases
Amoco Prod. Co. v. Thompson, 516 So. 2d 376 (La. Ct. App. 1987). “R.S. 30:4(A). The Commissioner has the authority to make any reasonable rule, regulation and/or order that is necessary to properly administer and enforce the Conservation Law.”
State of La. v. Dep't of Energy, 519 F. Supp. 351 (W.D. La. 1981).
Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson, 731 So. 2d 190 (La. 1999). “30:4(A), "[t]he commissioner has jurisdiction and authority over all persons and property necessary to enforce effectively the provisions of the Chapter and all other laws relating to the conservation of oil or gas." In furtherance of that jurisdiction, La.”
Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson, 709 So. 2d 824 (La. Ct. App. 1998).
CEDYCO CORP. v. Dep't of Nat. Res., 993 So. 2d 271 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(B) — 1 case
State ex rel. Louisiana Off. of Conservation v. Ball, 99 So. 3d 100 (La. Ct. App. 2012).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C) — 9 cases
Amoco Prod. Co. v. Thompson, 516 So. 2d 376 (La. Ct. App. 1987). “R.S. 30:4(A). The Commissioner has the authority to make any reasonable rule, regulation and/or order that is necessary to properly administer and enforce the Conservation Law.”
Frank C. Minvielle, L.L.C. v. IMC Global Operations, Inc., 380 F. Supp. 2d 755 (W.D. La. 2004). “R.S. 30:4(C). The DEQ has jurisdiction over remedial action plans and has set forth a process by which remediation plans are approved and enforceable.”
Cockerham v. Atl. Richfield Co., 615 So. 2d 547 (La. Ct. App. 1993). “To support this argument, ARCO cites LSA-R.S. 30:4(C) which gives the Commissioner of Conservation authority to make reasonable rules and regulations regarding the plugging and abandonment of oil wells.”
State of La. v. Dep't of Energy, 519 F. Supp. 351 (W.D. La. 1981).
Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson, 731 So. 2d 190 (La. 1999). “30:4(A), "[t]he commissioner has jurisdiction and authority over all persons and property necessary to enforce effectively the provisions of the Chapter and all other laws relating to the conservation of oil or gas." In furtherance of that jurisdiction, La.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C)(1) — 2 cases
Davis Oil Co. v. TS, INC., 962 F. Supp. 872 (E.D. La. 1997). “E & F) and section 30:4(0(1) of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, not later than February 5, 1993.”
CEDYCO CORP. v. Dep't of Nat. Res., 993 So. 2d 271 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C)(1)(a)(i) — 1 case
CEDYCO CORP. v. Dep't of Nat. Res., 993 So. 2d 271 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C)(1)(b) — 2 cases
Cockerham v. Atl. Richfield Co., 615 So. 2d 547 (La. Ct. App. 1993). “To support this argument, ARCO cites LSA-R.S. 30:4(C) which gives the Commissioner of Conservation authority to make reasonable rules and regulations regarding the plugging and abandonment of oil wells.”
Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson, 709 So. 2d 824 (La. Ct. App. 1998).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C)(16) — 2 cases
Mills v. Davis Oil Co., 11 F.3d 1298 (5th Cir. 1994). “R.S. 30:4 provides “that the commissioner has jurisdiction and authority over all persons and property.”
Mills, III v. Davis Oil Co., 11 F.3d 1298 (5th Cir. 1994).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C)(16)(a) — 3 cases
Magnolia Coal Terminal v. Phillips Oil, 576 So. 2d 475 (La. 1991). “The jurisdiction of the commissioner of conservation, outlined in LSA-R.S. 30:4, extends to the plugging of oil and gas wells.”
Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson, 731 So. 2d 190 (La. 1999). “30:4(A), "[t]he commissioner has jurisdiction and authority over all persons and property necessary to enforce effectively the provisions of the Chapter and all other laws relating to the conservation of oil or gas." In furtherance of that jurisdiction, La.”
H.C. Drew Est. v. Reunion Energy Co., 689 So. 2d 457 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C)(3) — 3 cases
Amoco Prod. Co. v. Thompson, 516 So. 2d 376 (La. Ct. App. 1987). “R.S. 30:4(A). The Commissioner has the authority to make any reasonable rule, regulation and/or order that is necessary to properly administer and enforce the Conservation Law.”
Hunt Oil Co. v. Batchelor, 644 So. 2d 191 (La. 1994). “R.S. 30:4 A. The Commissioner has the authority to make any reasonable rule, regulation and/or order that is necessary to properly administer and enforce the Conservation Law.”
Exxon Corp. v. Thompson, 564 So. 2d 387 (La. Ct. App. 1990).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(C)(l)(b) — 1 case
Davis Oil Co. v. TS, INC., 962 F. Supp. 872 (E.D. La. 1997). “E & F) and section 30:4(0(1) of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, not later than February 5, 1993.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(D)(1)(b) — 1 case
Cockerham v. Atl. Richfield Co., 615 So. 2d 547 (La. Ct. App. 1993). “To support this argument, ARCO cites LSA-R.S. 30:4(C) which gives the Commissioner of Conservation authority to make reasonable rules and regulations regarding the plugging and abandonment of oil wells.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(E) — 1 case
Guzzetta v. Texas Pipeline Co., 477 So. 2d 1221 (La. Ct. App. 1985).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(E)(1) — 1 case
Oakville Cmty. Action Grp. v. Plaquemines Par. Council, 7 So. 3d 25 (La. Ct. App. 2009).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(E)(2) — 1 case
Guzzetta v. Texas Pipe Line Co., 485 So. 2d 508 (La. 1986).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 30:4(I)(7) — 1 case
Air Prods. Blue Energy, LLC v. Livingston Par. Gov't (M.D. La. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.